It started as things start, and it continues as things continue :

Now let's go through the principles.

1. The fractional line is *not* rendered as a *character*, chiefly because it is not one! The fractional line is instead rendered as *a bottom border* on the logical cell it margins, *which is exactly what it is*. Really, nobody thought of this before ? Why not ? Is it really not evident the fractional line is not part of the alphabet ?

2. Peculiar symbols, such as here the parens but in general anything else, integral signs, sigma, what have you can be made any fucking size you wish. Why not ?

3. The fractional line vertical alignment (where all the = and fraction lines line up) is handled via correct description of the height of cells.^{i} Note in the code how the k mod M portion is slightly smaller (24 px) whereas the 2 it exponents is slightly larger (32px) yet nevertheless the cell they go into is 112 px tall. Because all the logical "high" cells *have the same height* and all the logical "low" cells have also the same height (here the same throughout but this is not necessary) therefore the borders align.

4. Items under the fractional line are floated to the top ; items over the fractional line are floated to the bottom. You know which these are, because they're the cells that had a border in the first place!

5. The exponentiation spatiation is produced the logical way -- by creating a set of *four* cells, and filling the top right and the bottom left. Because that's the convention of exponent notation, isn't it, exactly : "cut the zone in four spaces, write the base bottom left and the exponent top right". So then ?

6. Localized fractional arrangements work exactly like the general! Within the context of that one particular cell of interest, the whole orchestra can be reproduced verbatim and to identical results.

———

Wednesday, 12 December 2018

Or maybe don't bother overmuch, and use a wordpress plugin: https://ro.wordpress.org/plugins/wp-latex/

Wednesday, 12 December 2018

I passed it along, kinda curious from the sidelines "what the problems will be".