There is no such thing.
Feminism has no cognitive content whatsoever. It isn't "a nonsensical belief which, for being nonsensical, only survives as a social signalling mechanism". Feminism is directly void of notional contentv, and strictly exists as a social signalling mechanism.
What does it signal ?
Two things. It allows beta males to signal they're not interested in participating sexually, and would much prefer to masturbate quietly in a corner while other people do it ; or to send wifey to be worked over by men and perhaps dine on the spunk she brings him home. Like this guy. Essentially, it allows the beta boy to advertise "I am a cuckold" in vanilla or otherwise sexually-repressive social environments. Considering that the cuckold inclination is present in most males and expresses something fierce in "civilised" settings, the ability to "be" a "feminist" is a lot more valuable for social communication than loud costume and speech affectations - there's a good degree of magnitude more cuckolds than faggots in the general population.
It also allows sexually disinterestedvi females to repress sexuality in a social setting. It is, of course, perfectly okay for me to whistle as she approaches and slap her butt as she struts by ; but if you try it... then she's a feministvii :)
To end on a bright note : there's really nothing wrong with it. People are what they are and like what they like. Relax and enjoy the rest of your life.
PS. Oh, and a lot of niggers are also making a bundle out of the Academia establishment/scam under the "feminist" banner. There, the fact that it means nothing whatsoever is a major advantage.———
- At the core, all socialism - be it nazism, or Stalinism, or Rooseveltism or Clintonism or Bushism or Obamaism or whatever myriad mutually interchangeable sorts, indistinct kinds and equivalent versions - contains the notion that the problems of individuals should be resolved by the group.
This is nonsense, of course, but at least it's something.
Since the actual noetic content is nonsensical, the chief practical use and utility of socialism necessarily becomes social signalling, as any and all "we believe nonsense" ideologies ever become. In the case of socialism, it mostly works to attract retards, idiots, the self-disabled, ugly women, slow runners, the fat, the lazy etcetera. The bulk of that is supplanted by a thin sliver of zealotry, the offspring of neurotic mothers who can't consequently find satisfaction in their own work ; alongside assorted fanatics, zealots and other weirdos.
This leads to the usual treadmill, any socialist flag will end up attracting the sort of scum looking to eat for free ; as the zealots and fanatics get tired of the peculiar set of leeches they've attracted they move on to a "new" socialist flag, but this one with a fist instead of a zwastika or whatever. This is the motivation for the endless incessant "flavorings" of the socialist shitcone. [↩]
- See Racists and socialists, there's in fact very little difference between the two terms - about as much as there is between the Ist plural and the IIIrd plural form of any pronoun. [↩]
- Mannerism is the belief that form may supplant function. All religion as practiced in the Anglosphere is mannerism, for instance, and one could say protestantism is a mannerist reformation of Christianity. [↩]
- Etatism is the belief that the state is important and notable. Usually found these days in a thick sauce of misrepresenting the state as something other than individual estate ; and generally a transparent ploy of socialist tendency. [↩]
- To verify this for yourself, ask the afflicted. This guy is no longer vegan, he's "ecofeminist" now :
I wound up tagging along with my mother and a couple of her friends to a concert benefiting the Occidental Center for the Arts tonight. We got dinner at the Union Hotel, where I was fortunate our server was vegetarian and well-prepared to help me through to getting a vegan meal at a decidedly non-vegan place when it turned out the menu I had downloaded that made me think I could eat there was out of date.
Some other chick is no longer fat, she's a "body something-or-the-other feminist". Some insecure spunkstain is no longer the weird kid nobody talks to at parties but an "intersectional feminist". Random helicopter mom whose children have finally escaped is a "mainstream feminist" or "traditional feminist" or whatever every Wednesday (she's also a knitting club Mahjongg champion on Fridays) and so on. [↩]
- For whatever reason. Such as for instance physical disability - maybe the lady's missing some parts ; or physical indisposition - maybe she's got diarrhea ; or psychological disability - maybe she grew up in a psychotic environment and as a result can't enjoy being fucked ; or psychological indisposition - maybe her poodle just got raped to shreds by a lecherous ram and she can't even think of accuplation until the image fades ; or contextual blockage - maybe she wouldn't fuck you if ~I~ ordered her to. The list is indeed long. [↩]
- This is drastically aggravated in those contexts where individuals convince themselves of the false theory that "the state" or "the socialist god" or whoever can and will protect them from violence, and so they aren't held to recognize the differentials of power socially nor cater to the powerful.
A girl brought up sanely will immediately recognize the serious dangers incumbent in attention whoring, but for a large swathe of ESL speakers with little social exposure (outside of pseudosocial media), the notion that failing to act submissive to the right guy is a surefire recipe to mass rape followed by execution may come as a surprise. [↩]