Case I - Wences vs MPEx, Breach of fiduciary duty
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I, the undersigned, having received the attached DEPOSIT slip from MPEx
(GPG fingerprint 8DDE 8C2B 4DE2 278A 95C3 D65B 9214 FC6B F1B6 9921), for
the sum of 130.04256216 mistakenly sent 130.00 BTC instead.
Attached further is a statement signed with the originatig BTC addresses
19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst to this effect.
This action is for recovery of the sum of 130.00 BTC under the Breach of
Fiduciary Duty cause.
https://blockchain.info/tx/fda6faabc7e95fd57de160642ecd351a469e954cdf61b8f17f35d20312c5fd34
https://blockchain.info/tx/7f60d180b378bcba98ede48c69073312067a6855002478e52f1ba5f0ea68024b
------BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ94kRAAoJEIjzwITvBkGnOnsH/jZA7PDscYqfq3i9t+UI3CHE
/Atn8wUsUx5buCEzE4AlTcw3lZdE4hadGIVFWrQP0Cd4bOHyq/OsBwnsOF8N2o6U
LsYvTvZtvXxRx9JFwC5bD1OZ5tBOFy2TsoXG8BOc4pXOR6ACS+UDzCdrwD+F4NkH
z3nTatdBFj0Cy3Neq5QncPawJrd6iRKWxYg/m6KbbYK9BCjERznNs/ybMe0rRfU1
ksdOKKDD6PjDRhfJcLBnsSJWl4gAshoKWRQTktAdKHuD63AfHAFKeDWsB76gbdvz
eMNe6X63SAP1rw+RungyUVbp+AaPWYHzlRO3Mf0IRUJyOzkNA8mlE2J2Lkt1NR8=
=6k94
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Having received notice of these proceedings I will be answering to the court. I request the exclusion of no judges from considering the matter.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=e4Id
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Claimant to pay 10.00000001 BTC to 1GG36DGeSYrZULtRTRoZwqMSupKtLeBjjF
-
Status : complete.
Respondent, to pay 10.00000002 BTC to 1GG36DGeSYrZULtRTRoZwqMSupKtLeBjjF
-
Status : complete.
Parties have made no specifications as to judge selection. Selected judges :
- Dan Miller (pigeons), 8C324970
- Rassah, 5EB6CA48
- Josh Popham (jcpham), 6ACE04AF
Thursday, 17 January 2013
Hash: SHA1
I can confirm that the round 130 BTC transaction showing in the blockchain has no known destination or purpose. I can also confirm it was close in time to a deposit order for 130 BTC, which was never paid. At about the same time there was another 130 BTC deposit order, which was however paid correctly and credited to the proper account.
I believe that the OP can prove beneficial ownership of the 130 BTC either by showing the MPEx signed DEPOSIT slip for the unpaid order. Alternatively, if they can quote the exact sum I am prepared it to confirm it. I think this would constitute proof because I can't see a way in which a third party would reasonably have obtained that information. Alternatively, signing a declaration with the sending address (19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst) would constitute reasonable proof also.
In general mispaid/rounded orders create significant overhead for MPEx, but exceptionally in this one case I am not pursuing compensation. Judges should however bear in mind that the prevailing party receives a fraction of the fees paid, and consequently entering a judgement for 100% in favour of the claimant would result in a 140 BTC award (130 claimed + 10 in fee). A 92.85% award would result in a ~130 BTC disbursement (~120.7 from the claim and ~9.3 from the fee) making the claimant whole. A lower award would in effect impose a fine on him.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=5dDJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thursday, 17 January 2013
Hash: SHA256
I propose jcpham keyid C71FB5ED6ACE04AF for the third judge in Case I - Wences vs MPEx, Breach of fiduciary duty.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQ+GO0AAoJEBRWgbGMMklwzS0H/3zBI9Mc14vn6LQUvhnpOWB/
tpRrq7EBEuJ+d58zPqpmN3/LZcxAgV/OH2pxpMl9U1wVfPiCUmDa/sAyejqQOa7C
ur21iEul+djIgYDVfoB7jO5NJFbxPuw/YYZiIo14FhDCz5E7lO4QswbMxyZVs89n
77/afK6GhMQ1CDBm87vGnh2J2d5S2Y0WK2UOoyL+t4lOyBz1z0wHssxha4pozv/u
utkbfbch3XWkn0w6ysfx1oHE7gjydG2D+2vClzhwpxqDkIs2moMPK075bIyV1xZ7
IBwnhJAi5RMkvrlJRguSoYxj1A2YWtarPORgj5Y7Ch807fYfn0BkZl0YWB4UJq4=
=vGrn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thursday, 17 January 2013
Hash: SHA1
I, the undersigned, having received the a DEPOSIT instruction from MPEx
(GPG fingerprint 8DDE 8C2B 4DE2 278A 95C3 D65B 9214 FC6B F1B6 9921), for
the sum of 130.04256217 mistakenly sent 130.00 BTC instead.
The bitcoin wallet I used to send those BTC 130 is a Blockhain.info web based wallet and its address is 19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst.
Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience I am causing you.
Wences
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ+G5eAAoJEIjzwITvBkGnzTUH/2r9z3y4RIMEzii+8W0uFw2m
67PSL5y2RNtZDrqTww84S2lQAlLPLeXcxLE3sv1gqoFM3DBuHQ2h+/BmZagkDkAL
WON9D8KXE4FOgxjJiBlEei1Mg20+wifSZmb4dAe9r9zvkX66/zzHle+UATgtZ3kj
DIl8GRGAss7/qVsYTk8LR0arPuBvKpRGRCov7QHR356bBBmKQnqJYddbTyXjjvOT
ubDrM/5LJHWES/GWpjAOsTuj/NqfBceAKBlEw66R76nK2R/c9ZaJ/waGHg/emH/C
ructbOgw8hWu7pzIiT1/fGAaT6uzpdYbT/z49aRL8ldYuZaH2giKrEYeU2c7Kvw=
=KCgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Friday, 18 January 2013
Hash: SHA256
I, Rassah, confirm that the third judge selected is jcpham
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8
iQE5BAEBCAAjBQJQ+IdtHBxSYXNzYWggPFJhc3NhaEB4Tmljb2xlLmNvbT4ACgkQ
abXz9162ykjJ7QgAvjDSRygSo0GOtvSW7U5sb2Eh9eFJGYMmwg9dTYRGxLKd2ZGW
a3pBcEW+G9MqxKWPtztC+38VqTT3eL2JTIPGwlEjVX47jUnZtVJxBQb+ibJBy0tt
jGvfJwv5k50pwxyAV5eMV69PrkS8tGXM6mR1sACeHR5z2VUFRrIXFW9GjZype9B7
GnI0cHQnlFENf1EnXP6vL7nT1nXjUTrzOxOaiM+fNPhoHIh+olHvT/6qU3jLwh2G
b34LPvvzTR0jMkfCy8cke7IVc7Q3vxAlqS9naxN1nx2WePfRJlaSUQwj8rifWs2n
D9TWS4VOHbiI7htwf6TdbYzahafmXaPaQAE4Uw==
=NYyo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Friday, 18 January 2013
Third judge recorded.
Friday, 18 January 2013
Hash: SHA256
Wences,
Can you use the "Sign Message - Sign a message to prove you own a bitcoin adddress." feature of blockchain.info as listed under the Import/Export section here: https://blockchain.info/wallet/features.
Can you paste the signed deposit slip?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQ+J3wAAoJEBRWgbGMMklwC30IAOiyFlE8p7rwIwvG94Is72Si
AYPnX06GYpy4B2Mw3yrs4/dIEEenqeHdjnOPq9prpLvSzsdkdCnzwxt+TAu7ynuO
raFgmKUn0cMtTb3ogggN7esVRj2h5+GrR7VpnJqfX+x4Gn9/oO0opmhCs7TYqFgF
KF/hX3ToCbtZSYCOnefxH90CNpnkoEEbDiV67IxzjS1Md6mTWSpYCpGI43YikgcK
T2dqQqj4FkyWZuuAWtGkxs9+AYtC60t/K4dQ7KsH/aUkXRbbESZOiWSpQwKGKXWW
ejM/QCyLU5b3SYnh9K5oN5+3CMD4yyfQAhxgDRMWgd6rEaKpto+D16eJzB0r7/o=
=xLTI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Friday, 18 January 2013
Piuk sez: "There is a sign message tool available from the actions button on the receive money tab."
Friday, 18 January 2013
Thank you, pigenons.
Here is the message signed with the address 19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst:
I, the undersigned, having received the a DEPOSIT instruction from MPEx
(GPG fingerprint 8DDE 8C2B 4DE2 278A 95C3 D65B 9214 FC6B F1B6 9921), for
the sum of 130.04256217 mistakenly sent 130.00 BTC instead.
To be used in ROTA court proceedings for recovery of said sum.
Wences
Signature: HBNlxhUDnEKbMl1p082ergE+ekRZINRmr12/DpZQy0sODhxGTE40HukSnPL+mQDDy8yg+bjQblA+NsJeI3XyoEs=
Sunday, 20 January 2013
Hash: SHA1
nomination accepted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)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=Ict5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Monday, 21 January 2013
Arguments closed. Judges have three days to enter their judgement.
Monday, 21 January 2013
Hash: SHA1
In Case I - Wences vs MPEx, Breach of fiduciary duty, I decide 100% of the 130 BTC in favor of claimant Wences, 0% or 0 BTC to Mpex. The entire fee of 10 BTC is also to be returned to claimant for a total of 140 BTC.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=Mj38
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Monday, 21 January 2013
Hash: SHA256
In Case I - Wences vs MPEx, Breach of fiduciary duty, I decide 100% of the 130 BTC in favor of claimant Wences, 0% or 0 BTC to Mpex. The entire fee of 10 BTC is also to be returned to claimant for a total of 140 BTC.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQ/YbzAAoJEBRWgbGMMklwhIEIALuDVW/skfEYMPZ7FnrrUk8C
VWQdcx4hmRug93jMZZ3m3EgLrMHfuQ9JSAP1Soz2wYgUPIk8cquL327olijrrnXo
m6vKrcmK9hF10ugVBl8jONEbbHE8JqMz43IYibMWdzbUnRHSpQlRCf2v9IILqG0e
p3SsFgit7EjkbTQWLQ22uABUMEiqPqRW7kOfhAOB+aSdfN1A15ZiTkgIv6+emQa0
mtA2ijDJJOfLhT6nLfwqKAsUDLIcKvsewanxUMrjBzqp1psSkDwvAURut1Pzb+ZJ
pjNNpr2ESzElOqjw8y4v4OOYIpV4oqyzKpRAVeKIb1GhGRFC/7wgVuz2b8oG4bc=
=PkyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
MPex does disclaim responsibility for customer errors in depositing, but correcting this error is a reasonable part of fiduciary duty.
pigeons 1LqYbqgiL5cxdKATvHSU2FJKUcismsQuW9
Monday, 21 January 2013
This steampunk-futurist-like thing appears quite interesting.
Behind this shiny plastic screens we have money, which is virtual, brokers, dealers and o' fuck, even judges.
Future is gonna be shit fun.
Monday, 21 January 2013
@
pigeons, jcpham The rulings you posted fail to include a Bitcoin address.Please re-do.
Monday, 21 January 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
1MGT5S5VMmxeW4Mj5a2Z8nyMBEdoSG1Gj7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=OI6j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
Hash: SHA256
In Case I - Wences vs MPEx, Breach of fiduciary duty, I decide 99.2% of the 130 BTC, or 129 BTC, in favor of claimant Wences, and 1 BTC to MPex as a fee for correcting Wences's mistake. The entire fee of 10 BTC is also to be returned to claimant for a total of 139 BTC, returned to originating address:
19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8
iQE5BAEBCAAjBQJQ/dv3HBxSYXNzYWggPFJhc3NhaEB4Tmljb2xlLmNvbT4ACgkQ
abXz9162ykgn4AgArq5LcGZM0FC45/rK38ho4YKPaCTTR8L4xtHFOUf+H96gtpVD
NHkhVAV6rlpdHTRXnai+1hkBx9x/ah3lzy5l5Xim/oUm8vTXbZBtNKiFuDKwBIVL
Bfs94N2vSC8CKAKbj46aNDku9VGQmJv+Fg95zUS7ItQbdNZWmrWFOlu4MVFshoyw
iazliG/d2zxmHUKXk0Xe1KjxbBbuxSN15QvzV7UafdLIhHxsSV9dnlwC6u8jVk7A
ARQpQ4MgCLGFLhcy94TtLfL1HjqN0Pz+4vFGaQv/5qLrw5Q9wh44VGQg7HFniY6G
/Gl818Dsl5b2oZIfohxwjemZCSpfxEZnpPtZEQ==
=2BML
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
You also forgot your BTC address I think ?
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
Hash: SHA1
Thank you pigeons, rassah, jcpham & mircea; much appreciated (and enjoyed the process, this is an interesting system!).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ/i8OAAoJEIjzwITvBkGnSWwH/inoc8hj62witK9BV0Bugwl4
+OzFn8fMbSzzEPTxcdLztakswhelXRIknJhw9sLp0i17kIFwTk1bst6UImgxEMMb
Ed7wqsm1ybfYNiVqOt8aD0GlZD81C+scVnhFx0zIIUBnrEvCmK+vpN9vBe4KR6o0
jMZ0HZ6YCs+hW4caSam7Dkk0b7W3mG2HVAT4PJHyXh3C47SqZuIOTCp76qQzM7yc
kK10w46TOQM1oxXaHcFZ92OcEKRkKzLKSReV3MI9lKsyXbs3iu0R7FGpeEWHi5ag
BVGnppCmebRt+sIS00S2nH4hZx8/PJbrJLdxI3fUeHIOCx9oMnIqYBF2wGFd1Qs=
=ltUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
Hey, please state an address.
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
Hash: SHA1
My bitcoin address is 19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ/tBjAAoJEIjzwITvBkGnQTIH/jNHAgBv1qnx5/3oIEr+lVmi
44hiB5XLKLgpVylApTYPVRUAKkPjwpgB49vZGwCXXgQyndC8LhyI0FBdhD7rBwAg
0/UGucbzM0qdmL0EiwOQDWGxpro6pLNv8eMj7GeOpdCq9op9dhr7e5tpT/4Pcz90
auecs1AYJal33Fwyjr1SmjKtxTXVmsW7OnBZU0Ho9l1dkne/g8fnJtPBsUCJwu/s
7WmMhr8NzzC6RPF1wOPZ+TLHVzc7iqsrD4f2GbsZajcO4KxdYJ9DqIR7ZXUjLc9M
7XxOBzTOjg7iAR8AtdHBzZFiScTSmjgoT5sKna1ptpABXpwXKEC72vVJQlKgMU0=
=bCOb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thursday, 24 January 2013
Hash: SHA256
I didn't do enough work to warrant a payment from this case, and thus will forgo receiving compensation. I've been too distracted on vacation this week.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8
iQE5BAEBCAAjBQJRAaD0HBxSYXNzYWggPFJhc3NhaEB4Tmljb2xlLmNvbT4ACgkQ
abXz9162ykiekAf9HymaUaXP6xJckUNC/2pqWDRyRnOiSOOkfqz66mHhoRxE9OYL
qxw+NwGqf5mMu6EjszjKDVhdcEtxEksJtAGxfpLJy52oP7bQU8aKoaNouiCHNwxQ
OOTDJL6o9IqH7E3NH0K4iUBdBGKsbPh7wIerKrgFcdGf7sLYeKtXqavB7UUfrAnc
1XTyiOZpIHU8YmsCdOb1icTqJ1nv1oBr04gubHmn1O1YrxZTOQHFlM6huJOewWyp
xoPKnMVSlUFbf12JgS2b5xXVoOEZsxiOEnzczm9VWZyovtQL2BLi5RMRavEOtdrf
+UI68qckS/H4SMZUTs17e3Yfsjj/e/V55zWUvQ==
=lF7r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Friday, 25 January 2013
I have donated my compensation to the Open Transactions project:
"txid" : "696e6d09248f5c0e604e4698e3f91f47be5b2663adbd046851f6ca59edd07c2e"