Because most people are idiots, in spite of never manning up and admitting to it
The most recent, second increase in new MPEx account registrations is not without its pitfalls.
Out of the past 100 or so new pubkeys sent (which covers about six days) maybe 10 people paid so far.
To be perfectly clear, it's not a matter of my opinion, or probability, or discussion that signing up for a financial service - even in a play currency like BTC, Monopoly Money or WoW gold - without having as much as cursorily and unattentively read the motherfucking FAQ is sufficient and indefeasible proof of idiocy. It is a matter of fact.
If you are one of the people who wrote these emails to me, you are an idiot. There is no discussion possible, you are an idiot. If you are one of the others, who cnat even wtire, but make up the chunk of ~90 or so people who discovered to their surprise and displeasure that they have to pay in order to acquire a seat at the exchange from the account confirmation email, you are just as much an idiot. Perhaps not an equally vocal one, but your head doesn't work enough to power a goat.
I do not believe idiots have any place in this world. You people shouldn't be alive. Until you grow some balls to resolve this problem yourself, please crawl into a hole somewhere and stay there. I do not wish to ever see you, talk to you or in any way interact with you. Nobody else does. You're humanity's dead weight, you're the cause everything costs more, takes longer and is less cool.
Just die already.
Because these idiots won't fucking die already, everyone else has to be inconvenienced. I deeply regret this. If it were practical I'd just kill them all with my own hand. Unfortunately, it is not practical, and so with my deepest and most sincere apologies to sane people everywhere I have to modify the MPEx FAQ. From now on, if the phrase "I understand that I will be required to pay 30 BTC as fees for registering this account, and I agree and promise to do so." does not appear in the email containing your key, it will be (silently) discarded.
I am sorry.
Sunday, 17 March 2013
Holly cow, reading this is like reading my own sentences! You are absolutely right there. World is full of unthinking people with severely limited perceptions. Way too fucking many of them!
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
I think true idiots are the semi 'clever' folks not being smart enough to compile a message that is understood by everyone.
Wednesday, 10 April 2013
@Bitcoin Megastore I see.
@Richard This may be true. The problem with that approach would be that only English speakers (any way you turn it a minority of "everyone") would be able to understand your message above.
While in principle this "everyone" approach has merits, it can't really be elevated to the status of scoring criteria.
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
I'm new to Bitcoin and found MPEx, saw the DICE stock.. I was planning to invest $50k-$100k
I have to say this article really killed my spirit to buy shares on MPEx.
So you are posting a screenshot of "an idiot's" email and then go on and rant for 3 paragraph sabout how big of an idiot he is but can't spare 2 words to explain why you aren't reducing this fee? You sound like a little child, that's not how a man solves a conflict, sorry.
Isn't the fact, that 500 people signed up and only 50 paid, a *HINT* that the fee is unattractive?
I myself, certainly can understand that people won't pay BTC30 (around $1,000-$3,000 in the last days) for a simple account creation that usually is free with similar services.
This fee is a burden for people to sign up, in turn to buy shares, in turn the whole market is suffering. Now who is the idiot? Is this so hard to grasp?
Personally I would pay the BTC30, because it would only be 3-6% of my intended investment.
But I wouldn't buy stock on MPEx as long as the BTC30 fee is there, just for the fact that I know nobody will sign up to drive the share prices higher.
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
The problems here'd be that
Other than that, there is no conflict here. This is education, and this is how education works : children are shown what they did wrong, and why. If they fail to make amends there's always the switch as a last resort and public humiliation as an intermediate step.
There are no "similar services". For as long as you've not quite grasped that fundamental point it's safe to say you still have a lot to learn yet. Other fundamental misunderstandings apparent in your text support that evaluation. Hopefully you have the BTC to finance that learning. Good luck!
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
Without defending the people who didn't read the T&Cs, I think you may want to reevaluate your pricing.
I personally wanted to use your exchange and never signed up because of this requirement. I didn't because I think that the price was too high. You say "they have to pay in order to acquire a seat at the exchange", but that's not true. Acquiring a seat in an exchange would mean that end users have to trade via you and pay you commissions/fees per trade. In that case the seat has value as it effectively earns rent. This is not the case here. Paying the 30BTC doesn't mean that other people can then trade via me and I will be able to earn commissions from their trades.
So, from that point of view, 30BTC (>$2k currently) just so that you can sign up is way too high. In fact, given that signing up doesn't give the user any privilege but actually gives the opportunity for you, the house, to earn more money, I don't understand why did you decide to set your fee structure that way. There's a reason why casinos and brokers alike prefer to sign up as many customers as they can, even giving sign-up bonuses. It's because they expect to make money off the average customer. You have decided to take a different approach.
It's really your call and of course you are very clear in what you say, you can name your price/fee structure and it's up to the rest of us to decide whether we want to be your customers, no argument about that. I just question the rationale behind it, and I make a case that this decision actually leads to lower profits for you.
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
How do you figure that ?!
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
@Mark Yes, you're correct. For reselling MPEx account, you need special broker license from exclusive reseller such as CoinBr.com. To obtain it, please send 99 BTC to CoinBr662GWdiqVz8mXJUnYjWZbBchKAb .
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
@jurov
if this is an attempt at sarcasm, it's pretty lame, and I'm being generous.
@mp
in the real world, a seat in an exchange means you don't get charged fees for trading but rather you can charge your clients who trade via you. Please show how this is the case with MPEx. Also, a seat in an exchange is an asset (thus it's transferable and can be traded on its own) as opposed to a fee, an expense.
Tuesday, 16 April 2013
What exactly am I showing you here ? The jurov guy is currently running a MPEx public broker based on his MPEx account, charging customers more per trade and less upfront (if anything at all, I don't recall). There's private brokers doing it too, for their own customers. All passthrough operators (and there's what, half a dozen or something) are parlaying their MPEx seats into assets on the 2nd tier exchanges.
You've basically landed on the shore of England and insist that there's no red busses, Big Ben or Westminster Abbey, and then ask to be shown them! What's wrong with buying a guide, or whatever ?
Wednesday, 17 April 2013
Well, my humor tends to be lame.... still, CoinBr is "exclusive" in a sense of being only online MPEx broker afaik. It does run over standard MPEx account, there were some minor accomodations and error fixes from MPEx as a result but they are equally provided to everyone.
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
Mircea Popescu, using a poor and unprofessional language like your doing is pretty idiotic. I'm not expecting you to admit it because, as you are saying so well, you are a real idiot.
Monday, 25 November 2013
yes!! this is absolutely correct! everyone who has another opinion or asks a question is an idiot and should be immediately exterminated. Any idiot would agree with Mircea!
Tuesday, 26 November 2013
Trilema welcomes all the derps.
Saturday, 30 November 2013
From here it looks like the speculative frenzy RE bitcoins will be the incentive necessary to encourage hackers to attack and break down Unix- based systems and render all of open source vulnerable. Seems extreme but BTC = $600-1,200+ anything becomes possible.
How many Mircea Popescus are there? Inquiring minds would like to know!
: )
Saturday, 30 November 2013
Why this specifically ?
Most routers run on linux, including phone, internet and everything else. That's a larger market than Bitcoin, why has it not provided incentive to "break down unix based systems" ?