How to make money on the Internet while pretending you know what you're talking about and accumulating a legion of mindless followers - for fun and profit!

Sunday, 02 February, Year 6 d.Tr. | Author: Mircea Popescu

herbijudlestoids Hope I can show you some cool stuff when the sample size gets bigger.
Vexual Trade it herbi.
mircea_popescu Night all.
kakobrekla Make a blog, post results. I hear that is what people do. Nite mp.
mike_c Sell predictions. Tell half of them it's going up, the other half it's going down. Next week, split your list again and repeat. Works for sports touts.
herbijudlestoids I might buy a couple of bitcoins and bet on just dice...maybe...kind of got my heart set on buying as much MPOE as I can.
mike_c That would be better than betting on jd.
herbijudlestoids Best mates here, peace.

* Now talking on #bitcoin-assets
mircea_popescu Wow mike_c knows how the sport tout biz works. Props.i Incidentally, this is how idiots like Keiser work, too. All the obscure web "financial experts", or bet picking experts, or so on work on the same business model :

  1. You put up a site with some content and drive a ton of traffic to it. Google ads, whatever. This is your start-up cost.
  2. You gather leads for your "special picks" list, which you contact via email. This is your stable of suckers.
  3. You split them in equal halves and give one half one pick, the other half the opposite.ii Now you have 50% of the list worth of people who think you must be on to something.
  4. You subdivide both divisions and feed them a new pick on a new event. Now you have : a list of people who know you fucked up twice, this you discard ; two lists of people who think you got one out of two, these you merge ; a most valuable list of idiots who think you got 2 out of 2. That latter list is your money maker. The merged list is where you mine for idiots.

This simple scheme allows you to actually extract a profit out of the stupidity of people who are too stupid to realise just how stupid they are. It's also how government works, without exception, everywhere.
ThickAsThieves Now swap lists for Financial News Networks.

mircea_popescu "all the obscure web "financial experts", or bet picking experts" :)
ThickAsThieves Surely someone has done a study how often TV picks work out to be worse than flipping a coin.

mircea_popescu Surely nobody has bothered. Because the scammors can pay, and can scream, whereas the idiots can't pay, and can scream too, and they will scream against their own interest and in support of the scammors. You don't get a MPOE-PR in all venues. In fact, she's so novel that people that guide themselves by "what I've seen"iii generally imagine she's a poor PR.
ThickAsThieves It's also funny that this is just economics, nothing sinister. Having MPOE-PR on TV just wouldnt be as profitable ad Mad Money.

mircea_popescu Well, science employed to dominate idiocy is the idiot's definition of sinister.

In general, a poor understanding of sampling, biases and other matters statistical is naught but an invitation to having your pocket picked while you're busy thanking the picker for doing you the favour and praising him to others for having taken the time.

Other than that, the direct results of this thing and its bretheren are that recommendations from nobody in particular are worth nothing at all ; that anonymous entities are not allowed to voice an opinion, nor are secret bloggers worth any credenceiv ; that social proof is meaningless in any online conversation (yes, that means nobody cares how many followers/likes/whatever you have) ; that voting is dead as a legitimizing device (not just culturally, but in politics too - you can no longer claim you represent Jormania on the grounds of having received X votes from random Jormanians) and plenty of other such goodies.

Welcome to the post-post-structuralism the Internet generated. I hope you'll like it here.

  1. The more models you know, the better chances you are to find one that works in any circumstance you may find yourself. Think of it like it were shoes : the more shoes a woman has, the more likely she is to not be able to go anywhere because she has no shoes. Erm... Ok, maybe that wasn't the best example I ever gave, but I still trust you get the idea. []
  2. Obviously if multiple variants are possible you can multi-split your list. For instance if an event has possible results A, B, C and D with chances 50%, 30%, 10% and 10% respectively, you'd be well advised to split your list into 4 bits in the same proportion and feed them the respective answers (so 50% of your suckers get A, 10% C etc). This can result in lists of people who think you're God, because you picked the right 10% event X times in a row, and all it cost you is whatever aggregating suckers costs - which since the Internet isn't really much at all. []
  3. As opposed to trying to understand what's happening. Simple pattern recognition, like most celenterates. []
  4. For all you know he's running fifty of the damned things, on the same model. Conde Nast for instance is trying exactly this, and has been for the past decade. Among plenty others. []
Category: 3 ani experienta
Comments feed : RSS 2.0. Leave your own comment below, or send a trackback.

17 Responses

  1. [...] appeals to authority and assorted nonsense you'd expect in the case of climate change proponents, Internet pundits and assorted intellectual malfeasants. I regard this sort of thing about as dimly as I regard [...]

  2. [...] you know what he's doing these days, by the way ? He's trying to pay the rent by playing the investment advisor. Because that's not soul crushing. Not no [...]

  3. [...] Justin O'Connell, Wendy McLeroy and others) set about to creating a shill venue.ii Like this : How to make money on the Internet while pretending you know what you’re talking about and accumula...! And it worked, of course, because the Internet is full of narcissist maniacs with nary a hint of [...]

  4. [...] Max is currently trying at the edges of becoming an online scammer "investment expert". That's right : he aspires to be Max Keiser. Before that, however, he was [...]

  5. [...] loudly that he is now making the Sun rise. In some times and places such skullduggery passes for a big deal. In most times and places it's a function for the common rooster, one of the less intelligent of [...]

  6. [...] to distinguish good ideas from wrong, or not-even-wrong ideas. But this can be readily overcome by sheer luck. The clincher is that you can't keep good ideas on the road, because various trivial obstacles that [...]

  7. [...] airholes) that they're not wearing any underwear, either. [↩]And let's reference the seminal How to make money on the Internet while pretending you know what you're talking about and accumulati... piece here, because rarely are amateurs as disinterested as mr B. Usually they just feign it, for [...]

  8. [...] it works, "saying it makes it true". All the democratic politician ever is -- is this. He's exactly the scammer, running a tree-based search on your stupidity. All his failures are applications of this, and all [...]

  9. [...] hundred balls, you can always easily select a box in which no ball has ever been. That's precisely what a demagogue does ; and the yokels will always fall for it -- from their point of view it's only natural that they [...]

  10. [...] settled lifestyle brought along gifts unknown before Pandora's box were opened. [↩]And apt to commercial exploitation, even. [↩]Where by "political" we do not mean political parties or the electoral system, but [...]

  11. [...] That's why you don't generally want to participate in the charade (and some kind or other of charade -- it'll aways [...]

  12. [...] what he says ? How can this possibly be bravado, then ? Braves risk death, this guy's just safely working the numbers. What else would you have him say ? (Spoiler : he'll say it). [↩]This entire pile of safe [...]

  13. [...] We'd have instead a different set of problems entirely. [↩]No, it's not a coincidence ; it's something else. Something that exists like toxoplasmosis : because idiots menalone will publish [...]

  14. [...] the elements to latch on to and the script will happily proceed from there on, "talking" to you in the systematic manner of scripts (while all the while the business end of whatever it's attached to keeps plodding on regardless, as [...]

  15. [...] the flow of historyii. The first oneiii came because I don't now remember who argued importantly in the manner of Internet dweebs that the reason I wasn't on #bitcoin-otc was really that I had been banned, and not personal [...]

  16. [...] All this, of course, served in the thick sauce of her partner (not even that terrible on the piano) being all excited and positive and supportive and whatever the fuck else contemporaneous idiocy / redditardism. Establishing, yet again and once more once and for all, for the last time, except really it's just again and again and again and all over again yet again -- because what the fuck can you do, with these idiots ?! -- , that no, it's not my "immunocompromised meat". It's the insufferable extranumerary twats that'll say anything, and were irresponsibly given the means to say it. By, among other irresponsible fucks, yours truly ; you've watched me do it. Because, in turn, it's impossible to discern fact from fiction and moron from moron on a 0-expenditure basis. Which, in the end, is really all they ever wanted or for that matter needed. [...]

  17. [...] I discuss it I'll thereby drive reliably six nines of all the public exposure either the piece, the supposed "author" or anything connected will ever get in their entire historical existence. Yet nevertheless -- [...]

Add your cents! »
    If this is your first comment, it will wait to be approved. This usually takes a few hours. Subsequent comments are not delayed.