BitBet, December 2013 Statement
Friday, 03 January, Year 6 d.Tr. | Author: Mircea Popescu
Received 235 new propositions, of which accepted 69, rejected 166.i
Total bets in worth 840.19515077 BTC.ii
Revenue : 13.52671009 BTC, of which :
- bets resolved : 9.45615473 BTCiii
- fees from refunds : 0.00071109 BTC
- advertising : 0 BTCiv
- house bets won : 1.81924644v
- gracious donations to shareholders : 2.25130892 BTC
Expenditure : 6.80113593 BTC, of which :
- referrals paid : 0.00113593 BTC
- house bets made : 6.80000000 BTC
Profit : 6.72557416 BTC, to be distributed as dividends.
This is BitBet's 12th monthly report, and with this BitBet is one year old. A performance few public BTC companies have managed to date, and indeed a notable accolade under the name of all those involved.
Mazel tov.
———- An overal slight increase of the quality of proposition on the background of a more significant increase in their volume. This can't be bad. [↩]
- Slightly under last month, but then again that was a massive record. Graphs :
[↩]
- 945.61534896 BTC total pool resolved this month. [↩]
- Some nibbles, nothing serious, in spite of just how easy and cheap it is to try it out. I suspect nobody in Bitcoin that wants any exposure has any coin, and nobody that has any coin wants any exposure. O, the social shyness of the gold standard, recall ? [↩]
- 3.51000000 BTC worth of house bets were resolved in the current month. [↩]
Category: S.BBET
Friday, 3 January 2014
Hash: SHA1
BitBet, December 2013 Statement
Operational results
Received 235 new propositions, of which accepted 69, rejected 166.i
Total bets in worth 840.19515077 BTC.ii
Revenue : 13.52671009 BTC, of which :
bets resolved : 9.45615473 BTCiii
fees from refunds : 0.00071109 BTC
advertising : 0 BTCiv
house bets won : 1.81924644v
gracious donations to shareholders : 2.25130892 BTC
Expenditure : 6.80113593 BTC, of which :
referrals paid : 0.00113593 BTC
house bets made : 6.80000000 BTC
Profit : 6.72557416 BTC, to be distributed as dividends.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSxufWAAoJECevdTIfJInoAJwH/iBxiATIhjOQMOuNbsO4I45y
ZJdpuB1TFNim8JdMTglomT5EFipyO21ZcBhbNPRWwxVFHVwn/CfDEuAub6Pj97F0
lrHKI9vQ/ax259vDH4RQnPTryKyFS1p6x/HMCED3wCubWv3mH8cdGkShKGg3T74n
SWWglYJSxv/VQXbN0dfbXukCJlbs4BtmrRIJIh9HiL23uqLy3h/UX0q8I61q5IZk
Fq1/fgGJc9vqbJse1Oci4dJV2HbiHzqbqUX9Z+TsOMov9Q1W9BmurKkohIdF5lEN
HTrnTu1KyhbqTDxv5m3XhgDI8ja+HkcGnCn4rt0zy8ScAVVW0M6OBgENKkZUdDk=
=FJTL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Sunday, 5 January 2014
"fees from refunds" isn't included in the revenue (it is neither added nor subtracted). Seems odd to have a line item that is just ignored in the sums.
Tuesday, 7 January 2014
Aha, thanks for catching this oversight. It's getting rolled into next month's revenue.