I own erotica like Zeus owns Olympus

From today's log :

mp_en_viaje asciilifeform, don't feel too bad, this isn't "sad" just because not obviously useful ; it's glorious, because correct. id much rather read this than w/e, say yest's attempt at the claiming of sleeping beauty.

mp_en_viaje what happened was that 1. i was looking through search results for "daughter encounter", the why we'll not include as we can't regress this storytelling forever into endless pastⁱ ; and then 2. ran into dude killed for being dude, which i suppose is kinda sad, but w/e, america rite ; and then 3. fell on "Take It For Daddy: A Rough and Reluctant Bondage-Sex Encounter Between Stepdad and Daughter", The world’s greatest erotica writer, Kelly Leigh proudly presents "Take It For Daddy" – Incredibly hot sex stories featuring stepdaughters and their stepfathers!

mp_en_viaje which 4. made me exclaim "what the fuck is wrong with these idiotsⁱⁱ, ~I~ am the world's greatest erotica writer, and by such a fat margin that if i were the mvp of the winning team, nobody else writing erotica would be even good enough to be accepted as last choice in one of the feeder clubs of the conference's weakest team.

mp_en_viaje which in turn 5. provoked girly to mention anne rice, because whatever, as a virgin tween she got really hot and bothered over the princess getting sold by the prince to some merchants who stuffed her cunt fulla figs and such things.

mp_en_viaje so she found me a copy, and 6. i proceeded to read. and i ran into bounty aplenty, such as :

mp_en_viaje 6.a. "And approaching her, he gave a soft gasp as he touched her cheek, and her teeth through her parted lips, and then her tender rounded eyelids." sparked protest because ~everyone else~ is fucking decrepit and gaunt and dusted over in spider webs, so the disparity provokes in me the expectation a spider's jumping right out, antisexual 100%

mp_en_viaje 6.b. "Her face was perfect to him" provoked protest because it's a cop out : the woman "kills two rabbits with one stone", by avoiding BOTH the work of describing her face, AND the work of explaining credibly why these two like each other. yet the job of the writer is 100% and precisely NOT to make this deal ; because if they make it, even once, then their story inescapably becomes "this is a good^H^H^H^Hgreat story', five words like that.

mp_en_viaje 6.c. "her embroidered gown had fallen deep into the crease between her legs so that he could see he shape of her sex beneath it" produced the protestation that this woman has never seen embroidery (or, i guess, never seen girls in work out pants without panties).

mp_en_viaje 6.d. "Her ni**les were a rosy pink as were her lips, and the hair between her legs was darkly yellow and curlier than the long straight hair of her head, which covered her arms almost down to her hips on either side of her." actually killed the read, because 6.d.I. the rosy pink of the lips is NEVER THE SAME as the hue of the lips, this is 9yo coloring ; yet I have seen four digit young cunts and the two hues are always eminently distinct

mp_en_viaje 6.d.II. wtf is "darkly yellow" ; 6.d.III. wtf is "curlier than perfectly straight" ; 6.d.IV. you DO NOT wish to have her arms "covered in hair" ; then he proceeds to 6.d.V. "cut her sleeves" in the very next line, notwithstanding she was saying "arms" here, and well, i can not read this.

mp_en_viaje this read mechanically failed ; i have no qualms with whoever managed to jack off to anne rice nevertheless -- but it is NOT good. even if it works for you. because "works for me" ain't the fucking criteria of goodness. mp being able to read through the thing, ie, CORRECTNESS, is the criteria of goodness.

mp_en_viaje so there you go, i'd rather read you than A. N. Roquelaure ; and this isn't a rhetorical turn of phrase, it is literal description of actual historical occurrence.

mp_en_viaje and no -- no apologies for log clutter ; this imo is the exact opposite of log clutter. this is because there are no spurious details included -- if it's long, it's because the point is intricate.

mp_en_viaje http://btcbase.org/log/2019-07-24#1924476 << this, btw, includes all, living and dead, from d. h. lawrence to whoever the fuck you wish to pick, salo 0.1 marquis de sade, jane austen, WHOEVER wilkes, beerbohm, Ekström/Hasdeu, J M Cain, d g rosetti, really ~obscure~ shit a la a musina or nobody...
a111: Logged on 2019-07-24 08:48 mp_en_viaje which 4. made me exclaim "what the fuck is wrong with these idiots, ~I~ am the world's greatest erotica writer, and by such a fat margin that if i were the mvp of the winning team, nobody else writing erotica would be even good enough to be accepted as last choice in one of the feeder clubs of the conference's weakest team.

mp_en_viaje there just is nobody the fuck else, not even fucking close, nor ever was. and we're not even discussing ~range~ here, the fact that i'm one and these are legion. we're simply saying that out of all humans who ever lived, nobody came even close in any way and on any direction. i own erotica like zeus owns olympus.

mp_en_viaje actually come to think of it, fuck that, ima put this in the bylines.

It's what it is. What can you do ?

1. Isn't it a great band name, though ? [↩]
2. Seriously, Kelly Leigh ?! No fucking way. Not with a name like that, not in ten billion fucking years, retard. [↩]