MPEx (S.MPOE) December 2014 Statement

Tuesday, 06 January, Year 7 d.Tr. | Author: Mircea Popescu

Revenue : 673.35830623 BTC, of which :

  • Revenue from sales fee : 43.35830623 BTCi
  • Revenue from new accounts : 630 BTC

Expenditure : 25.62680292 BTC, of which :

  • Advertising, 0.1 BTCii
  • Tech, 24.87832294 BTC
  • Taxiii, 0.64847998 BTC

Profit : 647.83150331 BTC


Miscellaneous


Business as usual.

———
  1. Total trade : 21`679.15311576 BTC. []
  2. This is still the spots we're buying on BitBet. []
  3. Owed to Bitcoin's Sovereign. []
Category: MPEx
Comments feed : RSS 2.0. Leave your own comment below, or send a trackback.

5 Responses

  1. Peter Lambert`s avatar
    1
    Peter Lambert 
    Tuesday, 6 January 2015

    Something is wrong here? 630 + 43.35 = 673.35, not 195.75

  2. Mircea Popescu`s avatar
    2
    Mircea Popescu 
    Tuesday, 6 January 2015

    Heh typo / left over from prev. Thanks, fixed.

  3. Peter Lambert`s avatar
    3
    Peter Lambert 
    Monday, 12 January 2015

    http://btcbase.org/log/?date=12-01-2015#974313

    Is there really that many identical orders, or is there some sort of miscommunication between MPEx and Assbot?

  4. Mircea Popescu`s avatar
    4
    Mircea Popescu 
    Monday, 12 January 2015

    There's just an issue with the logs part, assbot never repeated it in channel.

  5. Mircea Popescu`s avatar
    5
    Mircea Popescu 
    Monday, 12 January 2015

    {assbot> [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 34150 @ 0.00052756 = 18.0162 BTC [-]
    {mircea_popescu> you clever boy you thestringpuller. i was just writing as to the stupidity of that.
    {assbot> [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 23226 @ 0.00054638 = 12.6902 BTC [+] {2}
    * assbot has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
    * assbot (~assbot@unaffiliated/kakobrekla/bot/assbot) has joined #bitcoin-assets
    * ChanServ gives channel operator status to assbot
    * ChanServ gives voice to assbot
    {assbot> [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 7750 @ 0.00055298 = 4.2856 BTC [+]
    {assbot> [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 41651 @ 0.00055298 = 23.0322 BTC [+]

    I suspect that join/part fixed it.

Add your cents! »
    If this is your first comment, it will wait to be approved. This usually takes a few hours. Subsequent comments are not delayed.