A new Lordship List ?
As reported by Mike's excellent tool, the current list is as follows :
| Rating | To | To Avg. | To Count | To Rank | Timestamp | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | justusranvier | 1.9 | 13 | 337 | Aug. 12, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | mthreat | 1.3 | 8 | 832 | Aug. 12, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | fluffypony | 1.7 | 40 | 109 | Aug. 12, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | dignork | 1.4 | 17 | 363 | Aug. 12, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | fabianb | 1.7 | 12 | 402 | Aug. 12, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | mod6 | 2.0 | 27 | 137 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | joecool | 2 | 38 | 84 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | punkman | 1.0 | 22 | 362 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | nanotube | 3.6 | 205 | 2 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | davout | 2.1 | 22 | 159 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | dub | 1 | 7 | 1,050 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | artifexd | 1.3 | 8 | 830 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | diametric | 1 | 3 | 1,886 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | chetty | 1.8 | 8 | 601 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | pete_dushenski | 1.1 | 18 | 439 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | namworld | 1.8 | 24 | 177 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | pankkake | 0.9 | 14 | 703 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | apocalyptic | 1.4 | 54 | 87 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | thestringpuller | 1.9 | 15 | 297 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | mike_c | 2 | 15 | 277 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | jurov | 1.9 | 38 | 95 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | moiety | 1.4 | 10 | 605 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | bingoboingo | 1.7 | 35 | 119 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | nubbins` | 1.7 | 27 | 163 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | thickasthieves | 1.9 | 23 | 172 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | asciilifeform | 2.1 | 21 | 173 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | ben_vulpes | 1.7 | 30 | 148 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | mircea_popescu | 2.0 | 112 | 16 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
| 1 | kakobrekla | 1.9 | 79 | 37 | April 11, 2014 | #bitcoin-assets |
As far as substractions are concerned, I'd propose taking off justusranvier, fabianb, dub, joecool, nanotube, namworld, pankkake, apocalyptic, moiety, thickasthieves, broadly on the grounds that they don't seem specifically alligned with the Republic to any degree. Haven't been seen around in ages, aren't doing anything whatsoever - keeping them on the list probably bothers a lot of other people who would meet a similar bar but aren't actually on the list. Nanotube's exclusion specifically is important because he has an immense downstream list, and it happens a shade too often that people we don't know can self voice on the grounds of that relationship. None of these would, at least to my mind, be exclusions with prejudice, which is to mean exactly what it means in court : should they later find the time, interest and inclination to contribute substantially (as I have no doubt any actually could), there's going to be more revisions.
As far as additions are concerned, I'd propose cazalla (Qntra editor in chief.), danielpbarron (Lots and lots of logistics work.), trinque (Current deedbot maintainer.), mats (Lots of paralegal work, other open projects.), hanbot (MPOE-PR, F.MPIF manager etc.).
Comments welcome!
Friday, 24 April 2015
Seems solid, especially the additions.
Friday, 24 April 2015
Substraction suggestion: justusranvier.
Friday, 24 April 2015
That's a point.
Monday, 27 April 2015
Do I get a discount on shoes or something w/ membership?
Monday, 27 April 2015
You probably get a discount on your lion taming class, to be held at Colliseum, room 404, date TBA.
Monday, 27 April 2015
I am aligned with the additions/subtractions proposed.
Monday, 27 April 2015
I'll back this set of changes as well.
For the record, I'd not personally propose either justusranvier or moiety for removal, though not for any particularly good reasons on either account.
Monday, 27 April 2015
I am abstaining.
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
Yeah, maybe the proper way is not to vote but to wot.
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
So far this isn't even voting, more like MP absolutism.
How'd WoT work in such a way to avoid teh well documented problems of democracy ?
Tuesday, 28 April 2015
> So far this isn't even voting
Fair 'nuff