<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The insecure twits, the needy canadians, the RSR americans and ongoingly in this vein, until sanity falls over. And also -- beyond.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2020/the-insecure-twits-the-needy-canadians-the-rsr-americans-and-ongoingly-in-this-vein-until-sanity-falls-over-and-also-beyond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2020/the-insecure-twits-the-needy-canadians-the-rsr-americans-and-ongoingly-in-this-vein-until-sanity-falls-over-and-also-beyond/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 18:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2020/the-insecure-twits-the-needy-canadians-the-rsr-americans-and-ongoingly-in-this-vein-until-sanity-falls-over-and-also-beyond/#comment-153041</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 06:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=94199#comment-153041</guid>
		<description>Probably on qntra, but it wasn't the bit you quote, I'm pretty sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably on qntra, but it wasn't the bit you quote, I'm pretty sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braindamage</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2020/the-insecure-twits-the-needy-canadians-the-rsr-americans-and-ongoingly-in-this-vein-until-sanity-falls-over-and-also-beyond/#comment-153029</link>
		<dc:creator>braindamage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 05:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=94199#comment-153029</guid>
		<description>&#62; there's memorialized somewhere (maybe on qntra ?

&lt;a href="http://qntra.net/2018/07/uk-court-issues-no-sanctions-over-gross-violations-of-surveillance-law/"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; might be the qntra on the matter whose lulziest bits &lt;a href="https://archive.is/BJ80A#selection-977.0-997.1"&gt;went&lt;/a&gt;: 

"Privacy International then sought a judicial review to challenge the tribunal's decision on general warrants – but the government argued that decisions of the IPT are not amenable to judicial review, citing Section 67(8) of Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (as was in force at that time), which reads:
'Except to such extent as the Secretary of State may by order otherwise provide, determinations, awards, orders and other decisions of the Tribunal (including decisions as to whether they have jurisdiction) shall not be subject to appeal or be liable to be questioned in any court.'
Privacy International countered that this section should be read in restricted terms, arguing parliament could not have intended it to be read as excluding all resource to judicial review – an argument rejected by the High Court in February 2017, and then the Court of Appeal six months later."

However, this ended up being nominally &lt;a href="http://archive.li/bqf5s"&gt;overturned&lt;/a&gt; at the Supreme Court a few months later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; there's memorialized somewhere (maybe on qntra ?</p>
<p><a href="http://qntra.net/2018/07/uk-court-issues-no-sanctions-over-gross-violations-of-surveillance-law/">This</a> might be the qntra on the matter whose lulziest bits <a href="https://archive.is/BJ80A#selection-977.0-997.1">went</a>: </p>
<p>"Privacy International then sought a judicial review to challenge the tribunal's decision on general warrants – but the government argued that decisions of the IPT are not amenable to judicial review, citing Section 67(8) of Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (as was in force at that time), which reads:<br />
'Except to such extent as the Secretary of State may by order otherwise provide, determinations, awards, orders and other decisions of the Tribunal (including decisions as to whether they have jurisdiction) shall not be subject to appeal or be liable to be questioned in any court.'<br />
Privacy International countered that this section should be read in restricted terms, arguing parliament could not have intended it to be read as excluding all resource to judicial review – an argument rejected by the High Court in February 2017, and then the Court of Appeal six months later."</p>
<p>However, this ended up being nominally <a href="http://archive.li/bqf5s">overturned</a> at the Supreme Court a few months later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2020/the-insecure-twits-the-needy-canadians-the-rsr-americans-and-ongoingly-in-this-vein-until-sanity-falls-over-and-also-beyond/#comment-150321</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 19:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=94199#comment-150321</guid>
		<description>You know, like &lt;a href="http://trilema.com/2016/what-is-the-leyla-black/"&gt;doing the Leyla Black&lt;/a&gt;, but with &lt;a href=http://trilema.com/2020/forum-logs-for-30-oct-2019/#2567998&gt;asciilifeform&lt;/a&gt; instead of Leyla.

Blac ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, like <a href="http://trilema.com/2016/what-is-the-leyla-black/">doing the Leyla Black</a>, but with <a href=http://trilema.com/2020/forum-logs-for-30-oct-2019/#2567998>asciilifeform</a> instead of Leyla.</p>
<p>Blac ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: User Name</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2020/the-insecure-twits-the-needy-canadians-the-rsr-americans-and-ongoingly-in-this-vein-until-sanity-falls-over-and-also-beyond/#comment-150320</link>
		<dc:creator>User Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 19:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=94199#comment-150320</guid>
		<description>What the f u c k  is asciilifeforming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the f u c k  is asciilifeforming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
