Comments on: Why it's not actually in your best interest to allow a hired third party to speak for you in criminal proceedings http://trilema.com/2012/why-its-not-actually-in-your-best-interest-to-allow-a-hired-third-party-to-speak-for-you-in-criminal-proceedings/ Moving targets for a fast crowd. Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:40:14 +0000 http://polimedia.us hourly 1 By: Grand reopening of #jwrd, the IRC channel « Fixpoint http://trilema.com/2012/why-its-not-actually-in-your-best-interest-to-allow-a-hired-third-party-to-speak-for-you-in-criminal-proceedings/#comment-200622 Grand reopening of #jwrd, the IRC channel « Fixpoint Sat, 13 May 2023 00:32:11 +0000 http://trilema.com/?p=44302#comment-200622 [...] as owners and operators of the channel, server and network. Indeed it's quite likely that being able to speak at all will come to depend on being a somebody or else having a somebody to temporarily grant you [...] [...] as owners and operators of the channel, server and network. Indeed it's quite likely that being able to speak at all will come to depend on being a somebody or else having a somebody to temporarily grant you [...]

]]> By: Mircea Popescu http://trilema.com/2012/why-its-not-actually-in-your-best-interest-to-allow-a-hired-third-party-to-speak-for-you-in-criminal-proceedings/#comment-159314 Mircea Popescu Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:30:39 +0000 http://trilema.com/?p=44302#comment-159314 Things change, dood. That's why they're things. To change. Things change, dood. That's why they're things. To change.

]]> By: WAnon http://trilema.com/2012/why-its-not-actually-in-your-best-interest-to-allow-a-hired-third-party-to-speak-for-you-in-criminal-proceedings/#comment-159313 WAnon Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:10:34 +0000 http://trilema.com/?p=44302#comment-159313 Thinking through all this logically...or at least trying to.... 1.If it is true that Trump lost the Presidential election because someone stole it from him, then who stole it from him? 2.If it is true that The Deep State, The Pizzeria Pedos, The Liberal Media, The Whatever Else can steal a Presidential election if they want to steal a Presidential election...then why did they not steal it the first time? Their appraisal of Donald Trump has changed little since 2016 if it changed at all, if they could steal in 2020 why didn't they steal in 2016? 3.Could it be true that nobody stole Trump's 2020 victory from him, but that in fact someone stole Trump's 2016 victory for him? Someone who also stole lots of other things, <a href="http://trilema.com/2016/to-the-dao-and-the-ethereum-community-fuck-you/">such as</a>, someone who <a href="http://trilema.com/2016/to-be-clear-hillary-clinton-lost-the-presidential-election-on-june-16th-2016/">actually said</a> he's going to do just that, mid-2016? Someone who demonstrated he in fact can do <a href="http://trilema.com/2014/spamming-reddit-an-experiment/">that kind of thing</a>, somehow... 4.If it is true that instead of some evil cabal stealing Trump's big win from him, it was MP who didn't steal a marginal win for him this time, like he did back in 2016....why could that be? Could it be that an illegitimate, or at least delegitimized President is much more valuable to MP's own agenda than a returned Trump? Is MP vengeful enough to gut someone who failed to do his bidding, which apparently he <a href="http://trilema.com/2016/and-they-wont-fucking-yield/?b=Shoot&e=them#select">actually published</a> just after the 2016 election results were announced? January 2014, Bitcoin Baron Keeps a Secretive Open Source OS Alive January 2021, Bitcoin Baron Turns Off MAGA What the fuck! Thinking through all this logically...or at least trying to....

1.If it is true that Trump lost the Presidential election because someone stole it from him, then who stole it from him?

2.If it is true that The Deep State, The Pizzeria Pedos, The Liberal Media, The Whatever Else can steal a Presidential election if they want to steal a Presidential election...then why did they not steal it the first time? Their appraisal of Donald Trump has changed little since 2016 if it changed at all, if they could steal in 2020 why didn't they steal in 2016?

3.Could it be true that nobody stole Trump's 2020 victory from him, but that in fact someone stole Trump's 2016 victory for him? Someone who also stole lots of other things, such as, someone who actually said he's going to do just that, mid-2016? Someone who demonstrated he in fact can do that kind of thing, somehow...

4.If it is true that instead of some evil cabal stealing Trump's big win from him, it was MP who didn't steal a marginal win for him this time, like he did back in 2016....why could that be? Could it be that an illegitimate, or at least delegitimized President is much more valuable to MP's own agenda than a returned Trump? Is MP vengeful enough to gut someone who failed to do his bidding, which apparently he actually published just after the 2016 election results were announced?

January 2014, Bitcoin Baron Keeps a Secretive Open Source OS Alive
January 2021, Bitcoin Baron Turns Off MAGA
What the fuck!

]]> By: Mircea Popescu http://trilema.com/2012/why-its-not-actually-in-your-best-interest-to-allow-a-hired-third-party-to-speak-for-you-in-criminal-proceedings/#comment-158727 Mircea Popescu Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:55:10 +0000 http://trilema.com/?p=44302#comment-158727 But of course. After all... what are "banks" even <a href="http://trilema.com/2020/forum-logs-for-08-mar-2017/#2249068">for</a> ? But of course. After all... what are "banks" even for ?

]]> By: Old Crow http://trilema.com/2012/why-its-not-actually-in-your-best-interest-to-allow-a-hired-third-party-to-speak-for-you-in-criminal-proceedings/#comment-158726 Old Crow Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:44:28 +0000 http://trilema.com/?p=44302#comment-158726 > This comment isn't "contextualized" by twitter because But wait, it gets better! <blockquote>Rosemary Vrablic and Dominic Scalzi have tendered their resignations to Deutsche Bank effective as of year-end, which was accepted by the bank</blockquote> These being the private banking folks who took over the Trump org accounts once the commercial section of DB blacklisted it. > This comment isn't "contextualized" by twitter because

But wait, it gets better!

Rosemary Vrablic and Dominic Scalzi have tendered their resignations to Deutsche Bank effective as of year-end, which was accepted by the bank

These being the private banking folks who took over the Trump org accounts once the commercial section of DB blacklisted it.

]]>