Sounds like someone's read too many Otto Skorzeny biographies.

I'm guessing the concept you define ostensively via your short list of examples is "wannabe alpha male who grew up consuming oestrogenated tap water, english-language-only education, etc"

I don't know the water enters into this (though I know who'd like it to) ; but the ESL part is important, because indeed, the intellectual world is divided between those who are familiar with Latin and those who are familiar with copywriting. There's a difference between clerks and scholars ; even if the clerks were once "clerics" this difference is indelible ; and your guy's a clerk.

From where I stand, "the furthest a sheep ever went towards the Torah" is not particularly interesting ; and the "without using the actual Torah or the actual tools of reading it, but only sticking to what a sheep's lot is on this earth" coda is not liable to breed any further interest. I have no idea what's your line, or if you even have one, but imagine Dali being introduced to quadriplegic kids who "drew", "as best as can be drawn in their situation". Who the fuck cares about the cripples, seriously now ? Dali draws for real, not for fakesies, cvasies, pantsuities ; nor is any room in the world for "nobody could accuse them" failures.

As to the last point : Trilema itself is probably larger than the sum total of what anyone asking that question will ever read ; the process of actually reading it answers that question in and of itself : follow the leads you perceive as you perceive them, and if you're out start over reading -- because as the slavegirls unexceptionally discover, there's no such thing as an "already read" Trilema article, they shift and change from under you (meaning, you learn things). More generally the question's ill posed, if I have something to say I am going to say it through the extremely elaborate, unparalleledly effectual machinery I've already built for myself, to serve this exact purpose. It's the height of comedy to imagine that I had something stuck in my craw that I didn't know how to get out before you came asking, what the fuck, "all hail the anonymous nobody going 'hey MP, do you have anything to say ?' because check out the wonder of wonders, MP didn't think of saying it nor knew it could be said before". That's something reserved for the proles and the plebs, the faceless army of muzzle wearers, who don't think they can take it off until someone tells them to.

Eh, I think I see what you're driving at, though Pervert is not really like a dude from Glengarry Glen Ross. I'm guessing the concept you define ostensively via your short list of examples is "wannabe alpha male who grew up consuming oestrogenated tap water, english-language-only education, etc", i.e., one who wants to be the toughest kid on the playground, but will still go back indoors the moment his female teachers ring the bell. BAP is kinda in the same category (as anyone who grew up in the anglo world is) but he's broken further out than most. I read a bunch of the guys often thrown into the vague categorization of "alt-right", and thought he was one of the few who had something original to say. Some quotes here: https://pastebin.com/rZRzeg6f

On that note, do you perchance have any writings you'd recommend (whether classical texts, soviet research papers, leaked cia documents, niche romanian blogs, whatever)? I enjoyed the various adnotations in your archives so thought it'd be interesting to know if any writers out there have merited an MP seal of approval.