<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 16:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aetc</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/#comment-124462</link>
		<dc:creator>aetc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=76957#comment-124462</guid>
		<description>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/1379/2018/

&lt;blockquote&gt;We find that, even though upper stratospheric ozone is recovering, the continuing downward trend in the lower stratosphere prevails, resulting in a downward trend in stratospheric column ozone between 60° S and 60° N. We find that total column ozone between 60° S and 60° N appears not to have decreased only because of increases in tropospheric column ozone that compensate for the stratospheric decreases. The reasons for the continued reduction of lower stratospheric ozone are not clear; models do not reproduce these trends, and thus the causes now urgently need to be established.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Tripleplusgood oxygen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/1379/2018/">https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/18/1379/2018/</a></p>
<blockquote><p>We find that, even though upper stratospheric ozone is recovering, the continuing downward trend in the lower stratosphere prevails, resulting in a downward trend in stratospheric column ozone between 60° S and 60° N. We find that total column ozone between 60° S and 60° N appears not to have decreased only because of increases in tropospheric column ozone that compensate for the stratospheric decreases. The reasons for the continued reduction of lower stratospheric ozone are not clear; models do not reproduce these trends, and thus the causes now urgently need to be established.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tripleplusgood oxygen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/#comment-124286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=76957#comment-124286</guid>
		<description>Sold, Mr. Frency Pouf! The republic shall not unwind this particular tidbit of progress, great success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sold, Mr. Frency Pouf! The republic shall not unwind this particular tidbit of progress, great success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr.A</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/#comment-124284</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr.A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=76957#comment-124284</guid>
		<description>Unless you decide to deliberately poisson yourself (while still minding about odour confort), it is preferable to have smelling VOCs rather then not smelling ones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you decide to deliberately poisson yourself (while still minding about odour confort), it is preferable to have smelling VOCs rather then not smelling ones...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/#comment-124170</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 23:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=76957#comment-124170</guid>
		<description>I don't see in what conceivable universe worker's health would be enough of a concern to stink up the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see in what conceivable universe worker's health would be enough of a concern to stink up the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aetc</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2018/the-moth/#comment-124169</link>
		<dc:creator>aetc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 23:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=76957#comment-124169</guid>
		<description>Workers' health actually, VOCs replaced freon. Has to do with why use masks and proper ventilation which requires two windows open to create a current.

Ammonia has a very low risk of toxicity since, ah, well, so many people smoke it like every 2 hours in cigarettes and no one is dying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workers' health actually, VOCs replaced freon. Has to do with why use masks and proper ventilation which requires two windows open to create a current.</p>
<p>Ammonia has a very low risk of toxicity since, ah, well, so many people smoke it like every 2 hours in cigarettes and no one is dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
