<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TMSR-RSA spec, extremely early draft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 16:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Review of the Bitcoin Category on trilema.com &#171; Ossa Sepia</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/#comment-148178</link>
		<dc:creator>A Review of the Bitcoin Category on trilema.com &#171; Ossa Sepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 08:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=74098#comment-148178</guid>
		<description>[...] early draft of TMSR-RSA encryption scheme29 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] early draft of TMSR-RSA encryption scheme29 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFW's 130 top Trilema picks to date &#171; Fixpoint</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/#comment-147725</link>
		<dc:creator>JFW's 130 top Trilema picks to date &#171; Fixpoint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=74098#comment-147725</guid>
		<description>[...] TMSR-RSA spec, extremely early draft [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TMSR-RSA spec, extremely early draft [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EuCrypt Chapter 10: OAEP with Keccak a la TMSR &#171; Ossasepia</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/#comment-126791</link>
		<dc:creator>EuCrypt Chapter 10: OAEP with Keccak a la TMSR &#171; Ossasepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=74098#comment-126791</guid>
		<description>[...] discussion of issues encountered and decisions made as well as a better approach to very pointy and very real problems (not a perfect approach, sure; just a few degrees of magnitude better than what one finds for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussion of issues encountered and decisions made as well as a better approach to very pointy and very real problems (not a perfect approach, sure; just a few degrees of magnitude better than what one finds for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EuCrypt Chapter 6: Keccak Transformations &#171; Ossasepia</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/#comment-126388</link>
		<dc:creator>EuCrypt Chapter 6: Keccak Transformations &#171; Ossasepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=74098#comment-126388</guid>
		<description>[...] will use Keccak for all its hashing and RSA padding needs, as per TMSR-RSA specification. In this age of ever-mutating labels on top of labels though, I have to clearly state that EuCrypt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will use Keccak for all its hashing and RSA padding needs, as per TMSR-RSA specification. In this age of ever-mutating labels on top of labels though, I have to clearly state that EuCrypt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EuCrypt Chapter 12: Wrapper C-Ada for RSA + OAEP &#171; Ossasepia</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/tmsr-rsa-spec-extremely-early-draft/#comment-126386</link>
		<dc:creator>EuCrypt Chapter 12: Wrapper C-Ada for RSA + OAEP &#171; Ossasepia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=74098#comment-126386</guid>
		<description>[...] This condition is a requirement of RSA and since oaep returns a block of the same length of TMSR RSA modulus, it follows that in some cases the oaep block will actually be a number bigger than the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This condition is a requirement of RSA and since oaep returns a block of the same length of TMSR RSA modulus, it follows that in some cases the oaep block will actually be a number bigger than the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
