<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Again with the "money laundering" bullshit.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The ownership of Bitcoin : custody, transactions and dispute resolution. &#171; Dorion Mode</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/#comment-199047</link>
		<dc:creator>The ownership of Bitcoin : custody, transactions and dispute resolution. &#171; Dorion Mode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 21:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=73678#comment-199047</guid>
		<description>[...] Perhaps this rings some alarm bells if you're in the habit of saying you "have cash in the bank or your brokerage account". Unless you're the owner of the bank, you have IOUs with the fiat bank. Even if you are the owner of a fiat bank, it's not likely you have all the cash to cover if everyone wants the cash you owe them tomorrow and if you're a smaller fiat bank, the ~90% of the digitally represented assets on your balance sheet are most likely in the custody of a fiat correspondent bank. Even if you're one of the central fiat banks you don't have enough berries to make jam for all the claims outstanding, since by their own numbers, only ~10% of the FRNs in circulation exist in physical form. The latest data (archived) (cached ASCII) on the cash comes from Dec 31st, 2021(v) and clocks in at $2.1875 Trillion. Their reported (archived) (cached CSV) quantity of M2 for January 1, 2022 clocks in at $21.640 Trillion. The war on cash starts with the language, leading you to think you have cash rather value stuck in a labyrinth of IOUs. Then it's limiting the value of the bills, $100 is a joak, yo.(vi) And don't get me started on the theft the socialists label, "Civil Asset Forfeiture". You're somehow the criminal if you're carrying a measly $10k and they're somehow upholding Justice when they take it from you for hookers and blow. It's not Justice, it's bullshit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Perhaps this rings some alarm bells if you're in the habit of saying you "have cash in the bank or your brokerage account". Unless you're the owner of the bank, you have IOUs with the fiat bank. Even if you are the owner of a fiat bank, it's not likely you have all the cash to cover if everyone wants the cash you owe them tomorrow and if you're a smaller fiat bank, the ~90% of the digitally represented assets on your balance sheet are most likely in the custody of a fiat correspondent bank. Even if you're one of the central fiat banks you don't have enough berries to make jam for all the claims outstanding, since by their own numbers, only ~10% of the FRNs in circulation exist in physical form. The latest data (archived) (cached ASCII) on the cash comes from Dec 31st, 2021(v) and clocks in at $2.1875 Trillion. Their reported (archived) (cached CSV) quantity of M2 for January 1, 2022 clocks in at $21.640 Trillion. The war on cash starts with the language, leading you to think you have cash rather value stuck in a labyrinth of IOUs. Then it's limiting the value of the bills, $100 is a joak, yo.(vi) And don't get me started on the theft the socialists label, "Civil Asset Forfeiture". You're somehow the criminal if you're carrying a measly $10k and they're somehow upholding Justice when they take it from you for hookers and blow. It's not Justice, it's bullshit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Taking of Pelham 123 x2 on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/#comment-143443</link>
		<dc:creator>The Taking of Pelham 123 x2 on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=73678#comment-143443</guid>
		<description>[...] foreign, all clear and Tide-fresh. But hey, it's all good, who's gonna ask fucking Sony about "money laundering", eh ? [&#8617;]If you believe this, by the way, if you think the entire set of wives with all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] foreign, all clear and Tide-fresh. But hey, it's all good, who's gonna ask fucking Sony about "money laundering", eh ? [&#8617;]If you believe this, by the way, if you think the entire set of wives with all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A story about Romania that's totally not about anything else. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/#comment-143423</link>
		<dc:creator>A story about Romania that's totally not about anything else. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=73678#comment-143423</guid>
		<description>[...] deviate capital flows away from the purposes of scientist-calvinism, which is practically speaking money laundering, right ? Also, sex crimes! The folk who don't understand "what benefit do I draw from square roots" [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] deviate capital flows away from the purposes of scientist-calvinism, which is practically speaking money laundering, right ? Also, sex crimes! The folk who don't understand "what benefit do I draw from square roots" [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part II (Natural Law as "Science") on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/#comment-143385</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ethics of Liberty, by Murray N Rothbard. Adnotated. Part II (Natural Law as "Science") on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=73678#comment-143385</guid>
		<description>[...] context" be "helpfully" offered. [&#8617;]Not always. For instance -- the murder of a certain criminal organisation's agents, florid and theatrically sadistic would have, besides the gratification of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] context" be "helpfully" offered. [&#8617;]Not always. For instance -- the murder of a certain criminal organisation's agents, florid and theatrically sadistic would have, besides the gratification of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2017/again-with-the-money-laundering-bullshit/#comment-122485</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2017 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=73678#comment-122485</guid>
		<description>Meanwhile I applied some slave labour to the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile I applied some slave labour to the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
