<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hi, this is the article title.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/#comment-154538</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=53073#comment-154538</guid>
		<description>Speaking of "using 1000s of terms known only to the dead man", I did a little spelunking. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;TEXT READABILITY CONSENSUS CALCULATOR (www.ReadabilityFormulas.com)

Purpose: Our Text Readability Consensus Calculator uses 7 popular readability formulas to calculate the average grade level, reading age, and text difficulty of your sample text. 
Your Results:

&lt;b&gt;Your text: Trilema Back to work, whore. (963 words total)&lt;/b&gt;

1.Flesch Reading Ease score: 65 (text scale)
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: standard / average. 
2. Gunning Fog: 11 (text scale)
Gunning Fog scored your text: hard to read. 
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 8
Grade level: Eighth Grade. 
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 8
Grade level: Eighth grade

5. The SMOG Index: 8
Grade level: Eighth grade

6. Automated Readability Index: 8
Grade level: 12-14 yrs. old (Seventh and Eighth graders)

7. Linsear Write Formula: 9
Grade level: Ninth Grade. 
----------------------------------------------
READABILITY CONSENSUS
----------------------------------------------
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:

Grade Level: 8
Reading Level: standard / average. Age of Reader: 12-14 yrs. old (Seventh and Eighth graders)
----------------------------------------------

&lt;b&gt;Your text: thelastpsychiatrist.com - 5 Things You Need To Understand About Wikileaks Before You Celebrate. Adnotated. (3243 words total)&lt;/b&gt;

1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 60 (text scale)
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: standard / average. 
2. Gunning Fog: 12 (text scale)
Gunning Fog scored your text: hard to read. 
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9
Grade level: Ninth Grade. 
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 9
Grade level: Ninth Grade

5. The SMOG Index: 9
Grade level: Ninth Grade

6. Automated Readability Index: 9
Grade level: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)

7. Linsear Write Formula: 11
Grade level: Eleventh Grade. 
----------------------------------------------
READABILITY CONSENSUS
----------------------------------------------
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:

Grade Level: 9
Reading Level: standard / average. Age of Reader: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)
----------------------------------------------

Total # of words: 3309
Total # of unique words: 1266 (38% of total text)
(show all unique words)
Total # of repeat words: 2043 (62% of total text)
(show all repeat words)

Average # of words per sentence: 17
Total # of sentences: 194

Total # of characters: 15023
Average # of characters per word: 4.5
(show words that exceed avg. chars)

Average # of syllables per word: 2
Total syllables in text: 4999

Total # of words with double syllables: 602
Percent of double syllables in text: 18%

Total # of words with single syllables: 2223
Percent of single syllables in text: 67%

Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 15%
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 484
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)
Trilema &#124; Repressing &#124; thelastpsychiatrist. &#124; Understand &#124; Wikileaks &#124; Celebrate. &#124; adnotated. &#124; Popescu &#124; wikileaks &#124; wikileaks &#124; wikileaks &#124; powerful. &#124; astonishing &#124; cablesi &#124; Netherlands. &#124; however &#124; Wikileaks &#124; wikileaks &#124; anything &#124; releasing &#124; clinical &#124; anything &#124; information &#124; strategy &#124; approaching &#124; violates &#124; Fortunately &#124; iii &#124; trivial &#124; Wikileaks &#124; skeptical &#124; Wikileaks &#124; authorityiv. &#124; Wikileaks/MSNBC &#124; Interfered &#124; interfered &#124; Wikileaks &#124; EXPERIENCE. &#124; pakistani &#124; Wikileaked &#124; documents &#124; Indian &#124; government &#124; covertly &#124; supplying &#124; Islamist &#124; militants &#124; Pakistan &#124; committing &#124; atrocities &#124; Wikileaks. &#124; Wikileaks &#124; statement &#124; factually &#124; corruption &#124; government &#124; byproduct &#124; diplomacy &#124; difficult. &#124; uncover &#124; corruption &#124; Government &#124; byproduct. &#124; institutions &#124; departments &#124; communicate &#124; another &#124; primary &#124; salacious &#124; revealing &#124; reluctant &#124; eventually &#124; business. &#124; adolescenta &#124; clitoris &#124; itvii &#124; individual &#124; everyone &#124; cameras &#124; masturbating &#124; government &#124; discipline &#124; computer &#124; personal &#124; remember &#124; viii &#124; frequently &#124; personal &#124; computer/email &#124; Jessica &#124; WikiCache &#124; information. &#124; Wikileaks &#124; documents &#124; easier &#124; documents &#124; popular. &#124; documents &#124; provided &#124; Wikileaks &#124; illegality. &#124; dedicated &#124; whistleblower &#124; anonymous &#124; narcissist &#124; anyonymous &#124; Wikileaks. &#124; important &#124; government &#124; senator's &#124; congressman. &#124; actually &#124; Wikileaks. &#124; evident &#124; secrecy &#124; desperately &#124; myriad &#124; multiple &#124; undisclosed &#124; safehouses &#124; interview &#124; important &#124; compelling &#124; popular. &#124; Already &#124; WikiClones &#124; personal &#124; Leftyleaks &#124; Rightyleaks. &#124; xiii &#124; anything &#124; anything &#124; America &#124; IndonesiaLeaks. &#124; opportunities &#124; opinions. &#124; primary &#124; anymore &#124; primary &#124; Baudrillard &#124; reality &#124; Wikileaks. &#124; Assange/Wikileaks &#124; popular. &#124; wikileaks &#124; antihero &#124; establishment. &#124; political &#124; communismxvii &#124; equally &#124; distributing &#124; bananas. &#124; bananas. &#124; policy &#124; resentment &#124; emperor. &#124; impotence. &#124; meaningful &#124; punishes &#124; xviii &#124; meaningful &#124; incrementally &#124; revolutions &#124; enthusiasm &#124; disobediencexx &#124; Obama. &#124; expected &#124; radically &#124; United &#124; entirely &#124; competent &#124; President &#124; reasonable &#124; disagree &#124; everything &#124; obvious &#124; everyone &#124; Everything. &#124; different &#124; necessarily &#124; Obama &#124; technical &#124; necessaryxxiii &#124; nebulous &#124; historically &#124; presidency. &#124; quarterdeck &#124; navigate &#124; Sargasso &#124; america &#124; Afghanistan &#124; Guantanamo &#124; secrecy &#124; extension &#124; identical &#124; immigration &#124; policy &#124; government &#124; deficits &#124; everyone &#124; indicated &#124; references &#124; statistical &#124; popularity &#124; Americans &#124; reflection. &#124; analogy. &#124; government &#124; industry &#124; internet &#124; regulation &#124; impossible &#124; corporations &#124; neutrality &#124; government &#124; restrictions &#124; xxviii &#124; remember &#124; wikileaks &#124; important &#124; strategy &#124; approaching &#124; information. &#124; tellingly &#124; obvious &#124; improvements &#124; shattering &#124; predicted" &#124; pretense &#124; slavegirl &#124; recently &#124; experience &#124; personal &#124; history &#124; immediately &#124; directly &#124; meaningful &#124; interpreted &#124; imagine &#124; experience &#124; considering &#124; completing &#124; attempting &#124; analytical &#124; consideration &#124; comparisons &#124; experience &#124; ablation &#124; otherwise &#124; recognizable &#124; important &#124; contextual &#124; commonly &#124; suffering. &#124; overpowering &#124; betraying &#124; involvement &#124; mechanisms &#124; survival &#124; themselves &#124; suffering &#124; readily &#124; obvious &#124; experience &#124; directly &#124; immediately &#124; meaningful &#124; experience &#124; therefore &#124; oppressive. &#124; necessary &#124; correlate &#124; possible &#124; subjective &#124; natural &#124; situation &#124; experience &#124; another &#124; substantial &#124; different &#124; experience &#124; anything &#124; possible &#124; historical &#124; subjective &#124; typically &#124; understand" &#124; directly &#124; fundamental &#124; reproductively &#124; objectification. &#124; organically &#124; immediately &#124; directly &#124; differently &#124; differently &#124; ultimately &#124; unrelated &#124; personhood &#124; awareness &#124; motherhood &#124; orthogonal &#124; Media" &#124; anything &#124; collection &#124; unreflective &#124; experientialists &#124; virtual &#124; Formula &#124; virtual &#124; Formula &#124; ~actually~ &#124; virtual &#124; obviously &#124; different &#124; predictably &#124; different &#124; actual &#124; depicted &#124; virtual &#124; generally &#124; participate &#124; representatives &#124; stupidity &#124; figurehead &#124; responsibility &#124; discussion". &#124; Remarkably &#124; fiatist &#124; pretense &#124; sovereignity. &#124; capacity &#124; idiots &#124; splendidly &#124; internal &#124; processes &#124; misstatement &#124; government &#124; discipline &#124; "computers" &#124; benefit &#124; adversarial &#124; employer &#124; sovereign &#124; Republic &#124; discipline &#124; fundamental &#124; precisely &#124; different &#124; altogether &#124; discipline &#124; somehow &#124; actually &#124; constituted &#124; aspirational &#124; obvious &#124; finally &#124; illegal &#124; possibly &#124; masturbating &#124; notwithstanding &#124; popular. &#124; history &#124; anymore &#124; occupy &#124; evanescent &#124; visible &#124; pantsuitisms &#124; exactly &#124; Overton &#124; "Republicans" &#124; survival &#124; becoming &#124; Democrats &#124; expeditionary &#124; invaded &#124; societal &#124; continent &#124; magnitude &#124; magnificence &#124; Republic &#124; finally &#124; myopia &#124; perception. &#124; immaterial. &#124; nobody &#124; contrary &#124; principal &#124; societal &#124; earthmoving &#124; machinery &#124; reality" &#124; important &#124; noticing &#124; Montezuma &#124; Maria &#124; anything" &#124; restatement &#124; formally &#124; mistaken &#124; irrelevant &#124; diagnosis. &#124; reality &#124; reality &#124; reality &#124; absolutely &#124; desperate &#124; housewife &#124; disinterest &#124; amirite. &#124; Communism &#124; utterly &#124; situation &#124; continued &#124; alternative" &#124; persevere &#124; uninteresting &#124; relationship &#124; horizon. &#124; interesting &#124; apparently &#124; interested. &#124; suddenly &#124; everything's &#124; punishing &#124; uninteresting &#124; hotter/smarter/talented &#124; coincidentally &#124; discussion. &#124; paradigm &#124; everyone &#124; Atlantic &#124; Atlantic &#124; however &#124; subhuman &#124; increment &#124; revolution &#124; specialize &#124; sexual &#124; revolution &#124; rioting &#124; completely &#124; moreso &#124; revolution &#124; experience. &#124; Guantanamo &#124; criminal &#124; organisation &#124; business. &#124; obvious &#124; intelligent &#124; randomly &#124; delusions &#124; Bahamas' &#124; personhood. &#124; Bwahahahaha. &#124; themselves &#124; idiotic &#124; Nobody &#124; everyone &#124; suddenly &#124; themselves &#124; incoherent &#124; babbling &#124; nonsense &#124; applauding &#124; anymore. &#124; nobody &#124; anything &#124; whatsoever &#124; seriously &#124; absolutely &#124; bugaboo &#124; government". &#124; fantasy &#124; "financials" &#124; actual &#124; "operations". &#124; business" &#124; undescended &#124; inferiority &#124; necessarily &#124; definition &#124; inferiority &#124; 

&lt;b&gt;Your text: The silver tusked boar (481 words total)&lt;/b&gt;

1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 83 (text scale)
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: easy to read. 
2. Gunning Fog: 7 (text scale)
Gunning Fog scored your text: fairly easy to read. 
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 6
Grade level: Sixth Grade. 
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 7
Grade level: Seventh Grade

5. The SMOG Index: 5
Grade level: Fifth Grade

6. Automated Readability Index: 6
Grade level: 10-11 yrs. olds (Fifth and Sixth graders)

7. Linsear Write Formula: 7
Grade level: Seventh Grade. 
----------------------------------------------
READABILITY CONSENSUS
----------------------------------------------
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:

Grade Level: 6
Reading Level: easy to read. Age of Reader: 10-11 yrs. olds (Fifth and Sixth graders)
----------------------------------------------

Total # of words: 480
Total # of unique words: 242 (50% of total text)
(show all unique words)
Total # of repeat words: 238 (50% of total text)
(show all repeat words)

Average # of words per sentence: 15
Total # of sentences: 31

Total # of characters: 1994
Average # of characters per word: 4.2
(show words that exceed avg. chars)

Average # of syllables per word: 1
Total syllables in text: 641

Total # of words with double syllables: 94
Percent of double syllables in text: 20%

Total # of words with single syllables: 368
Percent of single syllables in text: 77%

Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 4%
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 18
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)
January &#124; Popescu &#124; Levantine &#124; enamoured &#124; darkening &#124; Belabouring &#124; thickety &#124; retinue &#124; underleaf &#124; silvery &#124; obedient &#124; companions &#124; impudent &#124; humongous &#124; preventing &#124; Romanian &#124; apparently &#124; eulogy. &#124; 

&lt;b&gt;Your text: So I was thinking... (1393 words total)&lt;/b&gt;

1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 67 (text scale)
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: standard / average. 
2. Gunning Fog: 11 (text scale)
Gunning Fog scored your text: hard to read. 
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9
Grade level: Ninth Grade. 
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 7
Grade level: Seventh Grade

5. The SMOG Index: 8
Grade level: Eighth grade

6. Automated Readability Index: 9
Grade level: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)

7. Linsear Write Formula: 12
Grade level: Twelfth Grade. 
----------------------------------------------
READABILITY CONSENSUS
----------------------------------------------
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:

Grade Level: 9
Reading Level: standard / average. Age of Reader: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)
----------------------------------------------

Total # of words: 1425
Total # of unique words: 683 (48% of total text)
(show all unique words)
Total # of repeat words: 742 (52% of total text)
(show all repeat words)

Average # of words per sentence: 20
Total # of sentences: 71

Total # of characters: 6111
Average # of characters per word: 4.3
(show words that exceed avg. chars)

Average # of syllables per word: 1
Total syllables in text: 1994

Total # of words with double syllables: 277
Percent of double syllables in text: 19%

Total # of words with single syllables: 1030
Percent of single syllables in text: 72%

Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 8%
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 118
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)
september &#124; Popescu &#124; ungodly &#124; Florimund &#124; drivetrain &#124; calibrated &#124; however &#124; converters &#124; battery &#124; "redresor" &#124; converter &#124; safety &#124; supposedly &#124; carrying &#124; batteries &#124; location &#124; electronic &#124; cabriolets &#124; memories &#124; amicably. &#124; especially &#124; delivered &#124; courier &#124; coincidentally &#124; available &#124; everything &#124; conceivably &#124; available &#124; liqueurs &#124; cordials &#124; champagne &#124; zacusca &#124; together &#124; nipplepins &#124; mineral &#124; pharmaceutical &#124; vaseline &#124; buttslapping &#124; Viorica &#124; cute/humiliatory &#124; easily &#124; materiel &#124; icecream &#124; optimal &#124; humiliation. &#124; media" &#124; inconsequential &#124; subcultural &#124; handii &#124; copying &#124; lingerie &#124; everyone &#124; happening &#124; whatever &#124; evidently &#124; nonononon" &#124; publishing &#124; anything &#124; fantasize &#124; casually &#124; publicly &#124; humiliated &#124; casually &#124; understand &#124; coincidentally &#124; livresque &#124; unavoidable. &#124; inescapable &#124; anyways &#124; everything &#124; especially &#124; comedically &#124; necessarily &#124; hutchenhoot &#124; unlikely &#124; terrible &#124; iii. &#124; inevitable. &#124; inevitable. &#124; whatever &#124; dependencies. &#124; whatever &#124; practical &#124; optionality &#124; similarily &#124; actually &#124; alongside &#124; minimalistic &#124; foregoingly &#124; undescribed &#124; intervening &#124; intolerably &#124; unpleasant &#124; conclusion. &#124; nevertheless &#124; unpleasant &#124; tolerable &#124; otherwise &#124; everything &#124; masturbation. &#124; included &#124; included &#124; actually &#124; displayers &#124; anything &#124; ineluctable. &#124; development &#124; minimalistic &#124; discussion &#124; grandfathered &#124; expensive &#124; unhappiness &#124; avoided. &#124; exactly &#124; trivial &#124; multiple &#124; elegantly &#124; ridiculous &#124; 

Your text: Resplenduminous (3401 words total)&lt;/b&gt;

1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 70 (text scale)
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: fairly easy to read. 
2. Gunning Fog: 9 (text scale)
Gunning Fog scored your text: fairly easy to read. 
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 7
Grade level: Seventh Grade. 
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 8
Grade level: Eighth grade

5. The SMOG Index: 7
Grade level: Seventh Grade

6. Automated Readability Index: 6
Grade level: 10-11 yrs. olds (Fifth and Sixth graders)

7. Linsear Write Formula: 7
Grade level: Seventh Grade. 
----------------------------------------------
READABILITY CONSENSUS
----------------------------------------------
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:

Grade Level: 7
Reading Level: fairly easy to read. Age of Reader: 11-13 yrs. old (Sixth and Seventh graders)
----------------------------------------------

Total # of words: 3505
Total # of unique words: 1351 (39% of total text)
(show all unique words)
Total # of repeat words: 2154 (61% of total text)
(show all repeat words)

Average # of words per sentence: 13
Total # of sentences: 270

Total # of characters: 15529
Average # of characters per word: 4.4
(show words that exceed avg. chars)

Average # of syllables per word: 1
Total syllables in text: 5139

Total # of words with double syllables: 667
Percent of double syllables in text: 19%

Total # of words with single syllables: 2454
Percent of single syllables in text: 70%

Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 11%
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 384
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)
Resplenduminous &#124; disoriented &#124; hazily &#124; incomputables. &#124; confusion &#124; satisfying &#124; following &#124; nonsense. &#124; perfectly &#124; Tronador. &#124; nobody &#124; position &#124; natural &#124; iliopsoas &#124; disposable &#124; visceral &#124; stupidly &#124; catatonia &#124; adrenaline &#124; decided &#124; expecting &#124; whenever &#124; amateur &#124; muscular &#124; asian &#124; vietnamese &#124; anything &#124; appearance &#124; palettes &#124; personal &#124; preference &#124; consideration &#124; consisting &#124; Japanese &#124; suburban &#124; diversity &#124; ridiculous &#124; considering &#124; history. &#124; necrotrap. &#124; prematurely &#124; hepatocytes &#124; anything &#124; anaesthetic &#124; metabolized &#124; machinery &#124; presumably &#124; circulated &#124; aerated &#124; probably &#124; machinery &#124; "correctly". &#124; actually &#124; substitute &#124; debatable &#124; continued. &#124; exactly. &#124; 'generic' &#124; implemented &#124; whatever &#124; hesitated &#124; competent &#124; certainly &#124; possibly &#124; diagnosis &#124; engineering &#124; paramountly &#124; absolutely &#124; escapee &#124; implantation. &#124; memorizes &#124; Vietnamese &#124; suddenly &#124; Vietnamese &#124; rotated &#124; forefinger &#124; impatiently. &#124; capillaries &#124; hypertension. &#124; conversational &#124; stalemate &#124; surgical &#124; notepad &#124; medical &#124; equipment &#124; supplier. &#124; sophisticated &#124; computer &#124; everything &#124; arguing &#124; heatedly &#124; Mandarin &#124; delivery. &#124; notepad &#124; suddenly &#124; voluptuous &#124; magnetic &#124; terrible. &#124; cerebro. &#124; cerebro &#124; henceforth. &#124; imbecile &#124; "Everyone &#124; apparently. &#124; "Actually &#124; anywhere &#124; companion &#124; cleverly. &#124; easier &#124; prostitute &#124; anywhere &#124; anyway. &#124; department &#124; already &#124; pedestrians &#124; belated &#124; acceptance &#124; clinical &#124; violence &#124; infinitely &#124; disturbing. &#124; industrial &#124; Algebra &#124; evidently &#124; violating &#124; international &#124; serious &#124; corporate &#124; personal &#124; repeating &#124; oneself. &#124; abstraction &#124; suffering. &#124; assassins &#124; pragmatism. &#124; certainty &#124; humanity &#124; dissolving &#124; argument &#124; argument's &#124; infuriating &#124; heresies &#124; mathematician &#124; mathematical &#124; physical &#124; behavior &#124; semester &#124; philosophy &#124; mathematics &#124; conversation &#124; flirtation &#124; demented &#124; academics &#124; somewhere &#124; mathematical &#124; "Physical &#124; mathematics. &#124; mathematics. &#124; timeless. &#124; exactly &#124; universe &#124; electron. &#124; electron &#124; mechanics &#124; general &#124; relativity &#124; mathematical &#124; infrastructure &#124; particle &#124; functional &#124; analysis &#124; differential &#124; geometry. &#124; picosecond &#124; 'constructed' &#124; mathematical &#124; physical &#124; mathematics &#124; underpins &#124; Everything &#124; anyway. &#124; Everything &#124; particular &#124; mathematics &#124; mathematics &#124; conceivably &#124; anything. &#124; protested &#124; anything &#124; sneakily. &#124; consider &#124; physical &#124; behavior &#124; ludicrously &#124; specific &#124; mathematicians &#124; validate &#124; mathematics &#124; relevance &#124; universe &#124; nevertheless &#124; relevant &#124; physical &#124; computer &#124; neurotransmitters. &#124; physical &#124; conceded &#124; warily. &#124; mathematician's &#124; physical &#124; behavior &#124; executed &#124; interaction &#124; conjecture &#124; constructed &#124; infinite &#124; encompassed &#124; logical &#124; axioms &#124; included &#124; generalities &#124; assertion. &#124; mathematician &#124; logical &#124; manipulating &#124; physical &#124; neurotransmitters &#124; physical &#124; awareness &#124; "Mathematics &#124; actually &#124; organized &#124; equivalency &#124; property &#124; Cartesian &#124; coordinates &#124; equivalent &#124; directly &#124; obvious &#124; property &#124; coordinates &#124; everything &#124; mathematics &#124; independently &#124; statement &#124; moreover &#124; 'uncomprehending' &#124; example &#124; fundamentally &#124; exception &#124; physical &#124; actual &#124; mathematical &#124; statement &#124; related &#124; actual &#124; mathematical &#124; mediated &#124; ambiguity. &#124; mediated &#124; conveniently &#124; 'uncomprehendingly'. &#124; relationship &#124; 'deniable'. &#124; sexually &#124; ambiguous &#124; mathematics &#124; orthogonal &#124; definition. &#124; different &#124; proposing &#124; difference &#124; multiplying &#124; Platonist &#124; beginning &#124; everything &#124; axioms &#124; logically &#124; connected &#124; timelessly &#124; eternally &#124; immaterially. &#124; lifetime &#124; universe. &#124; eternal &#124; affirming &#124; consequences &#124; entity &#124; 'Every &#124; successor' &#124; etcetera &#124; universe &#124; consequences &#124; existence &#124; anything. &#124; imagine &#124; logical &#124; logically &#124; inconsistent &#124; mathematics &#124; 'invented' &#124; inconsistency. &#124; regardless. &#124; mathematics &#124; logically &#124; inconsistent &#124; anyway &#124; accident. &#124; universe &#124; computed &#124; discrepancy &#124; orthodoxies &#124; absorbing &#124; seriously &#124; outrageous &#124; statement. &#124; mathematics &#124; primordial &#124; consistency &#124; marzipan &#124; marzipan &#124; exactly &#124; nonchalance. &#124; everywhere &#124; absolute &#124; necessity &#124; mathematical &#124; physical &#124; computer &#124; logical &#124; chimerism &#124; specific &#124; nobody &#124; certificate. &#124; anything. &#124; mathematics &#124; instantly. &#124; together &#124; anything &#124; Platonist &#124; computation &#124; omega &#124; inconsistent &#124; Omega &#124; inconsistent &#124; arithmetic &#124; axioms &#124; contradicted &#124; contradictions &#124; "infinitely &#124; formally &#124; disallowed &#124; physically &#124; impossible. &#124; perfectly &#124; respectable &#124; mathematics &#124; "infinitely &#124; "inconveniently &#124; difference &#124; ordinary &#124; arithmetic &#124; intuitive &#124; axioms &#124; inconsistent &#124; contradiction &#124; physical &#124; manifestation &#124; 'computationally &#124; everyday &#124; calculations &#124; everyday &#124; physical &#124; somewhere &#124; universe &#124; "Exactly. &#124; continued &#124; Julius &#124; Egyptian. &#124; "Egyptian &#124; Egyptian &#124; slavegirl &#124; carrying &#124; argument &#124; &lt;/blockquote&gt;

According to the consensus of consensuses, Trilema is written such that it's accessible for the average girl just about to turn sixteen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of "using 1000s of terms known only to the dead man", I did a little spelunking. </p>
<blockquote><p>TEXT READABILITY CONSENSUS CALCULATOR (www.ReadabilityFormulas.com)</p>
<p>Purpose: Our Text Readability Consensus Calculator uses 7 popular readability formulas to calculate the average grade level, reading age, and text difficulty of your sample text.<br />
Your Results:</p>
<p><b>Your text: Trilema Back to work, whore. (963 words total)</b></p>
<p>1.Flesch Reading Ease score: 65 (text scale)<br />
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: standard / average.<br />
2. Gunning Fog: 11 (text scale)<br />
Gunning Fog scored your text: hard to read.<br />
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 8<br />
Grade level: Eighth Grade.<br />
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 8<br />
Grade level: Eighth grade</p>
<p>5. The SMOG Index: 8<br />
Grade level: Eighth grade</p>
<p>6. Automated Readability Index: 8<br />
Grade level: 12-14 yrs. old (Seventh and Eighth graders)</p>
<p>7. Linsear Write Formula: 9<br />
Grade level: Ninth Grade.<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
READABILITY CONSENSUS<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:</p>
<p>Grade Level: 8<br />
Reading Level: standard / average. Age of Reader: 12-14 yrs. old (Seventh and Eighth graders)<br />
----------------------------------------------</p>
<p><b>Your text: thelastpsychiatrist.com - 5 Things You Need To Understand About Wikileaks Before You Celebrate. Adnotated. (3243 words total)</b></p>
<p>1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 60 (text scale)<br />
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: standard / average.<br />
2. Gunning Fog: 12 (text scale)<br />
Gunning Fog scored your text: hard to read.<br />
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9<br />
Grade level: Ninth Grade.<br />
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 9<br />
Grade level: Ninth Grade</p>
<p>5. The SMOG Index: 9<br />
Grade level: Ninth Grade</p>
<p>6. Automated Readability Index: 9<br />
Grade level: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)</p>
<p>7. Linsear Write Formula: 11<br />
Grade level: Eleventh Grade.<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
READABILITY CONSENSUS<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:</p>
<p>Grade Level: 9<br />
Reading Level: standard / average. Age of Reader: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)<br />
----------------------------------------------</p>
<p>Total # of words: 3309<br />
Total # of unique words: 1266 (38% of total text)<br />
(show all unique words)<br />
Total # of repeat words: 2043 (62% of total text)<br />
(show all repeat words)</p>
<p>Average # of words per sentence: 17<br />
Total # of sentences: 194</p>
<p>Total # of characters: 15023<br />
Average # of characters per word: 4.5<br />
(show words that exceed avg. chars)</p>
<p>Average # of syllables per word: 2<br />
Total syllables in text: 4999</p>
<p>Total # of words with double syllables: 602<br />
Percent of double syllables in text: 18%</p>
<p>Total # of words with single syllables: 2223<br />
Percent of single syllables in text: 67%</p>
<p>Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 15%<br />
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 484<br />
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)<br />
Trilema | Repressing | thelastpsychiatrist. | Understand | Wikileaks | Celebrate. | adnotated. | Popescu | wikileaks | wikileaks | wikileaks | powerful. | astonishing | cablesi | Netherlands. | however | Wikileaks | wikileaks | anything | releasing | clinical | anything | information | strategy | approaching | violates | Fortunately | iii | trivial | Wikileaks | skeptical | Wikileaks | authorityiv. | Wikileaks/MSNBC | Interfered | interfered | Wikileaks | EXPERIENCE. | pakistani | Wikileaked | documents | Indian | government | covertly | supplying | Islamist | militants | Pakistan | committing | atrocities | Wikileaks. | Wikileaks | statement | factually | corruption | government | byproduct | diplomacy | difficult. | uncover | corruption | Government | byproduct. | institutions | departments | communicate | another | primary | salacious | revealing | reluctant | eventually | business. | adolescenta | clitoris | itvii | individual | everyone | cameras | masturbating | government | discipline | computer | personal | remember | viii | frequently | personal | computer/email | Jessica | WikiCache | information. | Wikileaks | documents | easier | documents | popular. | documents | provided | Wikileaks | illegality. | dedicated | whistleblower | anonymous | narcissist | anyonymous | Wikileaks. | important | government | senator's | congressman. | actually | Wikileaks. | evident | secrecy | desperately | myriad | multiple | undisclosed | safehouses | interview | important | compelling | popular. | Already | WikiClones | personal | Leftyleaks | Rightyleaks. | xiii | anything | anything | America | IndonesiaLeaks. | opportunities | opinions. | primary | anymore | primary | Baudrillard | reality | Wikileaks. | Assange/Wikileaks | popular. | wikileaks | antihero | establishment. | political | communismxvii | equally | distributing | bananas. | bananas. | policy | resentment | emperor. | impotence. | meaningful | punishes | xviii | meaningful | incrementally | revolutions | enthusiasm | disobediencexx | Obama. | expected | radically | United | entirely | competent | President | reasonable | disagree | everything | obvious | everyone | Everything. | different | necessarily | Obama | technical | necessaryxxiii | nebulous | historically | presidency. | quarterdeck | navigate | Sargasso | america | Afghanistan | Guantanamo | secrecy | extension | identical | immigration | policy | government | deficits | everyone | indicated | references | statistical | popularity | Americans | reflection. | analogy. | government | industry | internet | regulation | impossible | corporations | neutrality | government | restrictions | xxviii | remember | wikileaks | important | strategy | approaching | information. | tellingly | obvious | improvements | shattering | predicted" | pretense | slavegirl | recently | experience | personal | history | immediately | directly | meaningful | interpreted | imagine | experience | considering | completing | attempting | analytical | consideration | comparisons | experience | ablation | otherwise | recognizable | important | contextual | commonly | suffering. | overpowering | betraying | involvement | mechanisms | survival | themselves | suffering | readily | obvious | experience | directly | immediately | meaningful | experience | therefore | oppressive. | necessary | correlate | possible | subjective | natural | situation | experience | another | substantial | different | experience | anything | possible | historical | subjective | typically | understand" | directly | fundamental | reproductively | objectification. | organically | immediately | directly | differently | differently | ultimately | unrelated | personhood | awareness | motherhood | orthogonal | Media" | anything | collection | unreflective | experientialists | virtual | Formula | virtual | Formula | ~actually~ | virtual | obviously | different | predictably | different | actual | depicted | virtual | generally | participate | representatives | stupidity | figurehead | responsibility | discussion". | Remarkably | fiatist | pretense | sovereignity. | capacity | idiots | splendidly | internal | processes | misstatement | government | discipline | "computers" | benefit | adversarial | employer | sovereign | Republic | discipline | fundamental | precisely | different | altogether | discipline | somehow | actually | constituted | aspirational | obvious | finally | illegal | possibly | masturbating | notwithstanding | popular. | history | anymore | occupy | evanescent | visible | pantsuitisms | exactly | Overton | "Republicans" | survival | becoming | Democrats | expeditionary | invaded | societal | continent | magnitude | magnificence | Republic | finally | myopia | perception. | immaterial. | nobody | contrary | principal | societal | earthmoving | machinery | reality" | important | noticing | Montezuma | Maria | anything" | restatement | formally | mistaken | irrelevant | diagnosis. | reality | reality | reality | absolutely | desperate | housewife | disinterest | amirite. | Communism | utterly | situation | continued | alternative" | persevere | uninteresting | relationship | horizon. | interesting | apparently | interested. | suddenly | everything's | punishing | uninteresting | hotter/smarter/talented | coincidentally | discussion. | paradigm | everyone | Atlantic | Atlantic | however | subhuman | increment | revolution | specialize | sexual | revolution | rioting | completely | moreso | revolution | experience. | Guantanamo | criminal | organisation | business. | obvious | intelligent | randomly | delusions | Bahamas' | personhood. | Bwahahahaha. | themselves | idiotic | Nobody | everyone | suddenly | themselves | incoherent | babbling | nonsense | applauding | anymore. | nobody | anything | whatsoever | seriously | absolutely | bugaboo | government". | fantasy | "financials" | actual | "operations". | business" | undescended | inferiority | necessarily | definition | inferiority | </p>
<p><b>Your text: The silver tusked boar (481 words total)</b></p>
<p>1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 83 (text scale)<br />
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: easy to read.<br />
2. Gunning Fog: 7 (text scale)<br />
Gunning Fog scored your text: fairly easy to read.<br />
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 6<br />
Grade level: Sixth Grade.<br />
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 7<br />
Grade level: Seventh Grade</p>
<p>5. The SMOG Index: 5<br />
Grade level: Fifth Grade</p>
<p>6. Automated Readability Index: 6<br />
Grade level: 10-11 yrs. olds (Fifth and Sixth graders)</p>
<p>7. Linsear Write Formula: 7<br />
Grade level: Seventh Grade.<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
READABILITY CONSENSUS<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:</p>
<p>Grade Level: 6<br />
Reading Level: easy to read. Age of Reader: 10-11 yrs. olds (Fifth and Sixth graders)<br />
----------------------------------------------</p>
<p>Total # of words: 480<br />
Total # of unique words: 242 (50% of total text)<br />
(show all unique words)<br />
Total # of repeat words: 238 (50% of total text)<br />
(show all repeat words)</p>
<p>Average # of words per sentence: 15<br />
Total # of sentences: 31</p>
<p>Total # of characters: 1994<br />
Average # of characters per word: 4.2<br />
(show words that exceed avg. chars)</p>
<p>Average # of syllables per word: 1<br />
Total syllables in text: 641</p>
<p>Total # of words with double syllables: 94<br />
Percent of double syllables in text: 20%</p>
<p>Total # of words with single syllables: 368<br />
Percent of single syllables in text: 77%</p>
<p>Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 4%<br />
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 18<br />
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)<br />
January | Popescu | Levantine | enamoured | darkening | Belabouring | thickety | retinue | underleaf | silvery | obedient | companions | impudent | humongous | preventing | Romanian | apparently | eulogy. | </p>
<p><b>Your text: So I was thinking... (1393 words total)</b></p>
<p>1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 67 (text scale)<br />
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: standard / average.<br />
2. Gunning Fog: 11 (text scale)<br />
Gunning Fog scored your text: hard to read.<br />
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9<br />
Grade level: Ninth Grade.<br />
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 7<br />
Grade level: Seventh Grade</p>
<p>5. The SMOG Index: 8<br />
Grade level: Eighth grade</p>
<p>6. Automated Readability Index: 9<br />
Grade level: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)</p>
<p>7. Linsear Write Formula: 12<br />
Grade level: Twelfth Grade.<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
READABILITY CONSENSUS<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:</p>
<p>Grade Level: 9<br />
Reading Level: standard / average. Age of Reader: 13-15 yrs. old (Eighth and Ninth graders)<br />
----------------------------------------------</p>
<p>Total # of words: 1425<br />
Total # of unique words: 683 (48% of total text)<br />
(show all unique words)<br />
Total # of repeat words: 742 (52% of total text)<br />
(show all repeat words)</p>
<p>Average # of words per sentence: 20<br />
Total # of sentences: 71</p>
<p>Total # of characters: 6111<br />
Average # of characters per word: 4.3<br />
(show words that exceed avg. chars)</p>
<p>Average # of syllables per word: 1<br />
Total syllables in text: 1994</p>
<p>Total # of words with double syllables: 277<br />
Percent of double syllables in text: 19%</p>
<p>Total # of words with single syllables: 1030<br />
Percent of single syllables in text: 72%</p>
<p>Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 8%<br />
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 118<br />
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)<br />
september | Popescu | ungodly | Florimund | drivetrain | calibrated | however | converters | battery | "redresor" | converter | safety | supposedly | carrying | batteries | location | electronic | cabriolets | memories | amicably. | especially | delivered | courier | coincidentally | available | everything | conceivably | available | liqueurs | cordials | champagne | zacusca | together | nipplepins | mineral | pharmaceutical | vaseline | buttslapping | Viorica | cute/humiliatory | easily | materiel | icecream | optimal | humiliation. | media" | inconsequential | subcultural | handii | copying | lingerie | everyone | happening | whatever | evidently | nonononon" | publishing | anything | fantasize | casually | publicly | humiliated | casually | understand | coincidentally | livresque | unavoidable. | inescapable | anyways | everything | especially | comedically | necessarily | hutchenhoot | unlikely | terrible | iii. | inevitable. | inevitable. | whatever | dependencies. | whatever | practical | optionality | similarily | actually | alongside | minimalistic | foregoingly | undescribed | intervening | intolerably | unpleasant | conclusion. | nevertheless | unpleasant | tolerable | otherwise | everything | masturbation. | included | included | actually | displayers | anything | ineluctable. | development | minimalistic | discussion | grandfathered | expensive | unhappiness | avoided. | exactly | trivial | multiple | elegantly | ridiculous | </p>
<p>Your text: Resplenduminous (3401 words total)</p>
<p>1. Flesch Reading Ease score: 70 (text scale)<br />
Flesch Reading Ease scored your text: fairly easy to read.<br />
2. Gunning Fog: 9 (text scale)<br />
Gunning Fog scored your text: fairly easy to read.<br />
3. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 7<br />
Grade level: Seventh Grade.<br />
4. The Coleman-Liau Index: 8<br />
Grade level: Eighth grade</p>
<p>5. The SMOG Index: 7<br />
Grade level: Seventh Grade</p>
<p>6. Automated Readability Index: 6<br />
Grade level: 10-11 yrs. olds (Fifth and Sixth graders)</p>
<p>7. Linsear Write Formula: 7<br />
Grade level: Seventh Grade.<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
READABILITY CONSENSUS<br />
----------------------------------------------<br />
Based on (7) readability formulas, we have scored your text:</p>
<p>Grade Level: 7<br />
Reading Level: fairly easy to read. Age of Reader: 11-13 yrs. old (Sixth and Seventh graders)<br />
----------------------------------------------</p>
<p>Total # of words: 3505<br />
Total # of unique words: 1351 (39% of total text)<br />
(show all unique words)<br />
Total # of repeat words: 2154 (61% of total text)<br />
(show all repeat words)</p>
<p>Average # of words per sentence: 13<br />
Total # of sentences: 270</p>
<p>Total # of characters: 15529<br />
Average # of characters per word: 4.4<br />
(show words that exceed avg. chars)</p>
<p>Average # of syllables per word: 1<br />
Total syllables in text: 5139</p>
<p>Total # of words with double syllables: 667<br />
Percent of double syllables in text: 19%</p>
<p>Total # of words with single syllables: 2454<br />
Percent of single syllables in text: 70%</p>
<p>Percent of 3+ syllables in text: 11%<br />
Total # of words with 3+ syllables: 384<br />
3+ syllable words: (showing all 'hard' words)<br />
Resplenduminous | disoriented | hazily | incomputables. | confusion | satisfying | following | nonsense. | perfectly | Tronador. | nobody | position | natural | iliopsoas | disposable | visceral | stupidly | catatonia | adrenaline | decided | expecting | whenever | amateur | muscular | asian | vietnamese | anything | appearance | palettes | personal | preference | consideration | consisting | Japanese | suburban | diversity | ridiculous | considering | history. | necrotrap. | prematurely | hepatocytes | anything | anaesthetic | metabolized | machinery | presumably | circulated | aerated | probably | machinery | "correctly". | actually | substitute | debatable | continued. | exactly. | 'generic' | implemented | whatever | hesitated | competent | certainly | possibly | diagnosis | engineering | paramountly | absolutely | escapee | implantation. | memorizes | Vietnamese | suddenly | Vietnamese | rotated | forefinger | impatiently. | capillaries | hypertension. | conversational | stalemate | surgical | notepad | medical | equipment | supplier. | sophisticated | computer | everything | arguing | heatedly | Mandarin | delivery. | notepad | suddenly | voluptuous | magnetic | terrible. | cerebro. | cerebro | henceforth. | imbecile | "Everyone | apparently. | "Actually | anywhere | companion | cleverly. | easier | prostitute | anywhere | anyway. | department | already | pedestrians | belated | acceptance | clinical | violence | infinitely | disturbing. | industrial | Algebra | evidently | violating | international | serious | corporate | personal | repeating | oneself. | abstraction | suffering. | assassins | pragmatism. | certainty | humanity | dissolving | argument | argument's | infuriating | heresies | mathematician | mathematical | physical | behavior | semester | philosophy | mathematics | conversation | flirtation | demented | academics | somewhere | mathematical | "Physical | mathematics. | mathematics. | timeless. | exactly | universe | electron. | electron | mechanics | general | relativity | mathematical | infrastructure | particle | functional | analysis | differential | geometry. | picosecond | 'constructed' | mathematical | physical | mathematics | underpins | Everything | anyway. | Everything | particular | mathematics | mathematics | conceivably | anything. | protested | anything | sneakily. | consider | physical | behavior | ludicrously | specific | mathematicians | validate | mathematics | relevance | universe | nevertheless | relevant | physical | computer | neurotransmitters. | physical | conceded | warily. | mathematician's | physical | behavior | executed | interaction | conjecture | constructed | infinite | encompassed | logical | axioms | included | generalities | assertion. | mathematician | logical | manipulating | physical | neurotransmitters | physical | awareness | "Mathematics | actually | organized | equivalency | property | Cartesian | coordinates | equivalent | directly | obvious | property | coordinates | everything | mathematics | independently | statement | moreover | 'uncomprehending' | example | fundamentally | exception | physical | actual | mathematical | statement | related | actual | mathematical | mediated | ambiguity. | mediated | conveniently | 'uncomprehendingly'. | relationship | 'deniable'. | sexually | ambiguous | mathematics | orthogonal | definition. | different | proposing | difference | multiplying | Platonist | beginning | everything | axioms | logically | connected | timelessly | eternally | immaterially. | lifetime | universe. | eternal | affirming | consequences | entity | 'Every | successor' | etcetera | universe | consequences | existence | anything. | imagine | logical | logically | inconsistent | mathematics | 'invented' | inconsistency. | regardless. | mathematics | logically | inconsistent | anyway | accident. | universe | computed | discrepancy | orthodoxies | absorbing | seriously | outrageous | statement. | mathematics | primordial | consistency | marzipan | marzipan | exactly | nonchalance. | everywhere | absolute | necessity | mathematical | physical | computer | logical | chimerism | specific | nobody | certificate. | anything. | mathematics | instantly. | together | anything | Platonist | computation | omega | inconsistent | Omega | inconsistent | arithmetic | axioms | contradicted | contradictions | "infinitely | formally | disallowed | physically | impossible. | perfectly | respectable | mathematics | "infinitely | "inconveniently | difference | ordinary | arithmetic | intuitive | axioms | inconsistent | contradiction | physical | manifestation | 'computationally | everyday | calculations | everyday | physical | somewhere | universe | "Exactly. | continued | Julius | Egyptian. | "Egyptian | Egyptian | slavegirl | carrying | argument | </p></blockquote>
<p>According to the consensus of consensuses, Trilema is written such that it's accessible for the average girl just about to turn sixteen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/#comment-98377</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 10:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=53073#comment-98377</guid>
		<description>Two things here. One is the biodiesel boiler thingee. Why ? I don't see a good reason to off a fox in that the fox isn't more like a wolf, or that he' too red (foxes are supposed to be red!) or that he's too cute or not manly enough. So it's cute and unmanly, what of it ? Who said vixens are supposed to be surly or bitchy (in the wolfish sense of that term) or anything ? 

And this problem isn't resolved by mere nominalism, either, it's not just that "fox" is a registered "thing to be" (who keeps the registry ?) whereas the rabbit with horns is not.

I really don't see a problem with either the fox, the wolf or the horned rabbit. I wouldn't personally want to be one, I won't likely instruct any of my slaves to be one (well, maybe except for the vixen part, or the bitch part, or... heh whatever). 

Obviously if the rabbit with horns starts making noises about how everyone should tape horns to their head so "he has a sporting chance" and "check your unhorned privilege" he's getting set in concrete and run over with a slow moving, heavy piece of machinery. And if the fox spends his entire day waxing lyrical about how much he dislikes being a fox she's getting laughed into the ground to the point of developing an eating disorder and hopefully dieing a very painful, miserable death because of it. But other than these kinda considerations... who cares, really. So it's a fox. Let it be.

The other is the "should". Why the fuck on wheels should a beta male strive to be a "viking" or "tatar" or whatever the fuck people keep naming this thing ? It's hard being an alpha. It's difficulty. It's *expensive*. It's not for everyone, nor should it be. In most cases it's undesirable. All kindergartens all over the world have those little chairs made for children to sit comfortably in, that you could never sit on. Guess why ? Because it is god damned uncomfortable for a three year old to sit in your chair, that's why. His feet dangle. He has to ask you to raise him up and plonk him down there every time he wants to sit down. He has to jump and carefully coordinate his landing on the ground every time he's done sitting and wants to take a walk. Or a leak. It's inconvenient beyond measure, why all the pretense ?

In closing : there's way too much improving other people's lives going on these days, there's way too much "rational processes" being applied to fundamentally irrational, fundamentally private, fundamentally individual and independent matters. If you think a spoon smells funny you're going to throw it in the wash rather than eat your icecream with it, regardless how I "prove" to you, "rationally", that the spoon is just fine. There's no argument that'll ever make a pair of uncomfortable shoes fit you comfortably, even should the salesgirl on her knees bring out laser measurements and standards-compliance paperwork coming out her wazoo. There's no correct way to fuck your girlfriend, there's no "better" way to cook your breakfast, there's no "scientific" way to curl up in bed. Those things work for agriculture, and animal husbandry and metal processing &lt;em&gt;because we don't care about individual grains and sheep and hunks of iron&lt;/em&gt;. 

I wish the industrial revolution happened in a country less fucktarded in the head than England, there are plenty of islands out there that could have done much better. Actually... I suspect pretty much anyone'd have been a better choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things here. One is the biodiesel boiler thingee. Why ? I don't see a good reason to off a fox in that the fox isn't more like a wolf, or that he' too red (foxes are supposed to be red!) or that he's too cute or not manly enough. So it's cute and unmanly, what of it ? Who said vixens are supposed to be surly or bitchy (in the wolfish sense of that term) or anything ? </p>
<p>And this problem isn't resolved by mere nominalism, either, it's not just that "fox" is a registered "thing to be" (who keeps the registry ?) whereas the rabbit with horns is not.</p>
<p>I really don't see a problem with either the fox, the wolf or the horned rabbit. I wouldn't personally want to be one, I won't likely instruct any of my slaves to be one (well, maybe except for the vixen part, or the bitch part, or... heh whatever). </p>
<p>Obviously if the rabbit with horns starts making noises about how everyone should tape horns to their head so "he has a sporting chance" and "check your unhorned privilege" he's getting set in concrete and run over with a slow moving, heavy piece of machinery. And if the fox spends his entire day waxing lyrical about how much he dislikes being a fox she's getting laughed into the ground to the point of developing an eating disorder and hopefully dieing a very painful, miserable death because of it. But other than these kinda considerations... who cares, really. So it's a fox. Let it be.</p>
<p>The other is the "should". Why the fuck on wheels should a beta male strive to be a "viking" or "tatar" or whatever the fuck people keep naming this thing ? It's hard being an alpha. It's difficulty. It's *expensive*. It's not for everyone, nor should it be. In most cases it's undesirable. All kindergartens all over the world have those little chairs made for children to sit comfortably in, that you could never sit on. Guess why ? Because it is god damned uncomfortable for a three year old to sit in your chair, that's why. His feet dangle. He has to ask you to raise him up and plonk him down there every time he wants to sit down. He has to jump and carefully coordinate his landing on the ground every time he's done sitting and wants to take a walk. Or a leak. It's inconvenient beyond measure, why all the pretense ?</p>
<p>In closing : there's way too much improving other people's lives going on these days, there's way too much "rational processes" being applied to fundamentally irrational, fundamentally private, fundamentally individual and independent matters. If you think a spoon smells funny you're going to throw it in the wash rather than eat your icecream with it, regardless how I "prove" to you, "rationally", that the spoon is just fine. There's no argument that'll ever make a pair of uncomfortable shoes fit you comfortably, even should the salesgirl on her knees bring out laser measurements and standards-compliance paperwork coming out her wazoo. There's no correct way to fuck your girlfriend, there's no "better" way to cook your breakfast, there's no "scientific" way to curl up in bed. Those things work for agriculture, and animal husbandry and metal processing <em>because we don't care about individual grains and sheep and hunks of iron</em>. </p>
<p>I wish the industrial revolution happened in a country less fucktarded in the head than England, there are plenty of islands out there that could have done much better. Actually... I suspect pretty much anyone'd have been a better choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanislav Datskovskiy</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/#comment-98356</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanislav Datskovskiy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=53073#comment-98356</guid>
		<description>This epic reply really gnaws at the leather straps of the English language!

If you were to switch to Russian, you could handily edge out the mega-writer 'Беркем аль Атоми.' He is best described as titanic alien hybrid of D. Orlov and of this post;  the take-home message of Berkem's works is 'I am a Viking and you should too.'

As I understand, all men either are either: already 'vikings' - or wish they were!  And if wishes could somehow retroactively fix upbringing, we would all be!  Yet most are stuck somewhere in between.  But who doesn't like to read about heroes!  Check out what manages to pass for viking in the godforsaken English-speaking wastelands (search for 'Roissy' et al.)

The adventure in the snow (and other great examples from your works) aren't simply a matter of raw courage.  One needs actual, specific talents, just as for scything down Maxwell's Equations to four.  It isn't simply a matter of wanting it enough.

There is a whole horde of folks who have made an elaborate quest of trying to build a kind of ad-hoc cybernetic prosthesis for their missing viking upbringing.  Why do they do this, even though it is impossible?  I suspect that it is generally done as a last-ditch temporary alternative to fellating their Nagants.  Because - have you ever considered the question of what precisely ought to be done by folks who come to agree with your point, but do not have your talents?  At least some have mathematics, etc. to distract themselves with.

Perhaps there is some honourable use for folks who are not viking-enabled.  By all accounts, Tesla, Heaviside, etc. couldn't figure out how to fuck anybody at all. World is a little bit more complicated than 'real vikings vs. reddit eunuchs.'  Would you prefer that mr. H or T had gone straight to the biodiesel boiler?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This epic reply really gnaws at the leather straps of the English language!</p>
<p>If you were to switch to Russian, you could handily edge out the mega-writer 'Беркем аль Атоми.' He is best described as titanic alien hybrid of D. Orlov and of this post;  the take-home message of Berkem's works is 'I am a Viking and you should too.'</p>
<p>As I understand, all men either are either: already 'vikings' - or wish they were!  And if wishes could somehow retroactively fix upbringing, we would all be!  Yet most are stuck somewhere in between.  But who doesn't like to read about heroes!  Check out what manages to pass for viking in the godforsaken English-speaking wastelands (search for 'Roissy' et al.)</p>
<p>The adventure in the snow (and other great examples from your works) aren't simply a matter of raw courage.  One needs actual, specific talents, just as for scything down Maxwell's Equations to four.  It isn't simply a matter of wanting it enough.</p>
<p>There is a whole horde of folks who have made an elaborate quest of trying to build a kind of ad-hoc cybernetic prosthesis for their missing viking upbringing.  Why do they do this, even though it is impossible?  I suspect that it is generally done as a last-ditch temporary alternative to fellating their Nagants.  Because - have you ever considered the question of what precisely ought to be done by folks who come to agree with your point, but do not have your talents?  At least some have mathematics, etc. to distract themselves with.</p>
<p>Perhaps there is some honourable use for folks who are not viking-enabled.  By all accounts, Tesla, Heaviside, etc. couldn't figure out how to fuck anybody at all. World is a little bit more complicated than 'real vikings vs. reddit eunuchs.'  Would you prefer that mr. H or T had gone straight to the biodiesel boiler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/#comment-98348</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 08:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=53073#comment-98348</guid>
		<description>I think, if you care for the comparison, that it could be productively represented as a sexual matter.

Sexuality as a human behaviour is not, obviously, a matter of reproduction, in that over time it has become parasitised by all the mechanisms that construct what we call "civilisation" but would more proper be called politika, in loving memory of Aristotle's observation re bios and zoe. (In short, the entirety of the construction distinguishing man from beast dangles from our schlongs*, which is precisely why it was so important for the ancient Greek that statues are smallish in the loins. Largesse there connoted animality, you see, and so Hercules himself &lt;em&gt;had to&lt;/em&gt; carry around a threee inch thing my cat could comfortably fit.)

So now : consider the earlier discussion of the bitches I took out for a nude stroll in the snow. Why was it me doing it rather than my neighbour ? You can't ask me this, not really, but you can ask the neighbour, and he'll definitely tell you : because it's dangerous. That's right, he cares for the bitches' safety, and for their comfort. What if someone in the outskirts of the polis, some hoi polloi (which, obviously, is not what my neighbour is, in his own worldview) pounces on them and &lt;em&gt;rapes them!!1&lt;/em&gt; ? (And what if they like it ?) What if they catch their death of cold, barefoot in the snow, their cunt circulation working in such overdrive any snow touching it sublimates outright&#038;immediately ? He's an asshole &lt;em&gt;because he cares&lt;/em&gt;.

The real answer, obviously, is that he doesn't feel &lt;em&gt;comfortable&lt;/em&gt; doing his business in the public eye (and neither do the sort of women that'd consider him, one at a time). The dogs we met, being not people, had the normal curiosity of "what is this strangely dressed human of a delicious age and strangely nubile form". Well, perhaps minus the nubile part, I really doubt dogs manage to evaluate female humans for sexual fitness any more than I can evaluate pigeons. Apparently they pick somehow, but I have absolutely no idea how and it all makes no sense to me. 

Anyway : the people we met, being as they were well socialised zoa politeiai of a more advanced age, and serious and responsible enough to afford pets in a poor pesthole, and much more importantly : serious and responsible enough to afford to &lt;em&gt;aspire&lt;/em&gt; - because anyone can feed a dog, they existed somehow in medieval times and survived all famines to date, yet few can afford to do with their dogs what they saw the emperor do (on tv, of course), which apparently is taking them for walks in the forest and feeding them canned food - (leaving aside the "and stupid enough to aspire to such crap" part) couldn't. Wouldn't. Shouldn't. Won't. Didn't. 

Because that's what the whole fucking thing is based on, obviously, "you can come visit my apartment just as long as you don't..." and "you can put it a little in just as long as you won't...". That's civilisation : teaching people not to X Y Z allows you to pack the sardines closer in together, and this closeness breeds complexity which for the untrained eye irrigated by blood that's never seen testicles may well count as superiority. Because what would you rather have, a truely complex wristwatch that keeps horrible time or an hourglass that is never wrong ? ***

A child taking out his cock his penis his хуй and jacking off right before his father - perhaps splotching some splooge*5 on his greatcoat - is the ultimate, the absolute, the definitive antisocial act**, and he's definitely getting castrated for it. Taking a nude slut to your grandmother's aniversary party, or I guess in the English space Thanksgiving dinner, that'd be it. "Hi Mom, hi Dad, hey there Bob, Susan sonicetoseeyou. This is Candy and this is Brandy, they're my slavegirls. Strip, yo!" Everybody would be "uncomfortable", right ? Which is just a way to say "everyone'd be forced to evaluate what they're doing with their lives, and perhaps whether they're wasting same." Uncomfortable indeed.

Would their discomfort, well deserved and well earned &lt;em&gt;for being dickless fuckwits, all of them&lt;/em&gt; bother you, too ? Would it be uncomfortable for you that they're uncomfortable ? After all, you love them, they're your family, which reduces to saying "&lt;a href=http://www.seinology.com/scripts/script-116.shtml &gt;we had a pact, you know&lt;/a&gt;!"

So now, there it is : that's why. I write - and publish! - whatever crosses my mind because I solidly, and amply, despise the general public. Because I have as a matter of course constructed my own imperium, and my own auctoritas. Both, not just one. From the crenelated towers of that miniature fortress I can observe the strange mores of foreign people &lt;em&gt;as strange mores of foreign people&lt;/em&gt;. Gauss doesn't publish - and what's more! doesn't write!!! - whatever crosses his mind because &lt;b&gt;he&lt;/b&gt; doesn't feel that way. Let alone whether he is or could be, that's besides the point. He probably would have had a better shot than I ever will, but that's besides the point : any dog could walk his master, and any child could make his father go in the leash, on hands and knees, to fetch the ball. Few if any do. Why ?

And hence all the bullcrap about anonymity. O herpderp, they're &lt;a href=http://chrishateswriting.com/post/76431353368/the-anonymity-i-know &gt;anonymous online and therefore free men&lt;/a&gt;. No women, women can't exist anonymously. And since we're on that topic : men either. What's left ? Oh, they can be free fifteen year olds online, and that was the best time of their life anyway, so... yeah ? Sweet. Technical solutions to political **** problems, don't you know. It's gonna work one of these days &#60;/sarcasm&gt;.

---
* I can write a novel about why I chose that particular word, and I will. I could have said "penis", like I'm some sort of хуйless university professor. But I did not want to do that, because that's not what I am. Or I could have said "cock", like the sort of hillbilly consumerist law-abiding Лох that really believes the word for rooster is an adequate &lt;em&gt;replacement&lt;/em&gt; for his penis. You know, the word a replacement for the actual thing. Or I could have said dick, which is obscure enough to allow me an exit out of the net of "we would like you to use our words so that then you may be limited to considering problems we are ready to consider, and pick among the solutions we feel comfortable with". Schlong is merely one step further down that way, it's "the word those weird people use for the thing". 

** No, not fucking his mother, not killing his father. Nobody in his right mind would be interested in the old prune, and besides - we know she's a slut anyway, don't we. And as to killing one's father - that is a sign of failure. You want your father, collared and naked, suckling your toes. Doing your bidding. Enslaving your father is the point, and killing him merely shows you've failed. Which is why people rarely kill their fathers, and frequently put them in homes. Which is why the movies my dickless, dog-keeping compatriots watch often include this touching scene with the grown man and his father - gotta establish the cool of the protagonist somehow, right ?

*** The problem is drastically complicated by the fact that Sparta was defeated, not just by the Empire of Mindless Zombies (aka Parthia) but even by the United States of Athens. And for that matter, the Sioux and Iroquois and other Indians (the other sort) bit it from the complex-if-castrated group something fierce. Turns out it's expensive to be a man, and even more expensive to be free. Who knew ? 

**** Obviously that means psychiatric. There's no political problem at all outside of a translation of the shared insanity of groups of unhealthy minds.

*5 Wouldn't you say it's funny that English can't even &lt;em&gt;say&lt;/em&gt; pula, at all, but it has ~500 different terms for ejaculate, like the fucking Eskimos' snow : whether it's fresh or caked, dried or scented, they do motherfucking describe that juice. The thing it came out of, however... god help us. The situation is exactly reversed in Romanian, or at least it was, until this last generation of 15yo fuckwits living the life in the global soup of nothing online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, if you care for the comparison, that it could be productively represented as a sexual matter.</p>
<p>Sexuality as a human behaviour is not, obviously, a matter of reproduction, in that over time it has become parasitised by all the mechanisms that construct what we call "civilisation" but would more proper be called politika, in loving memory of Aristotle's observation re bios and zoe. (In short, the entirety of the construction distinguishing man from beast dangles from our schlongs*, which is precisely why it was so important for the ancient Greek that statues are smallish in the loins. Largesse there connoted animality, you see, and so Hercules himself <em>had to</em> carry around a threee inch thing my cat could comfortably fit.)</p>
<p>So now : consider the earlier discussion of the bitches I took out for a nude stroll in the snow. Why was it me doing it rather than my neighbour ? You can't ask me this, not really, but you can ask the neighbour, and he'll definitely tell you : because it's dangerous. That's right, he cares for the bitches' safety, and for their comfort. What if someone in the outskirts of the polis, some hoi polloi (which, obviously, is not what my neighbour is, in his own worldview) pounces on them and <em>rapes them!!1</em> ? (And what if they like it ?) What if they catch their death of cold, barefoot in the snow, their cunt circulation working in such overdrive any snow touching it sublimates outright&#038;immediately ? He's an asshole <em>because he cares</em>.</p>
<p>The real answer, obviously, is that he doesn't feel <em>comfortable</em> doing his business in the public eye (and neither do the sort of women that'd consider him, one at a time). The dogs we met, being not people, had the normal curiosity of "what is this strangely dressed human of a delicious age and strangely nubile form". Well, perhaps minus the nubile part, I really doubt dogs manage to evaluate female humans for sexual fitness any more than I can evaluate pigeons. Apparently they pick somehow, but I have absolutely no idea how and it all makes no sense to me. </p>
<p>Anyway : the people we met, being as they were well socialised zoa politeiai of a more advanced age, and serious and responsible enough to afford pets in a poor pesthole, and much more importantly : serious and responsible enough to afford to <em>aspire</em> - because anyone can feed a dog, they existed somehow in medieval times and survived all famines to date, yet few can afford to do with their dogs what they saw the emperor do (on tv, of course), which apparently is taking them for walks in the forest and feeding them canned food - (leaving aside the "and stupid enough to aspire to such crap" part) couldn't. Wouldn't. Shouldn't. Won't. Didn't. </p>
<p>Because that's what the whole fucking thing is based on, obviously, "you can come visit my apartment just as long as you don't..." and "you can put it a little in just as long as you won't...". That's civilisation : teaching people not to X Y Z allows you to pack the sardines closer in together, and this closeness breeds complexity which for the untrained eye irrigated by blood that's never seen testicles may well count as superiority. Because what would you rather have, a truely complex wristwatch that keeps horrible time or an hourglass that is never wrong ? ***</p>
<p>A child taking out his cock his penis his хуй and jacking off right before his father - perhaps splotching some splooge*5 on his greatcoat - is the ultimate, the absolute, the definitive antisocial act**, and he's definitely getting castrated for it. Taking a nude slut to your grandmother's aniversary party, or I guess in the English space Thanksgiving dinner, that'd be it. "Hi Mom, hi Dad, hey there Bob, Susan sonicetoseeyou. This is Candy and this is Brandy, they're my slavegirls. Strip, yo!" Everybody would be "uncomfortable", right ? Which is just a way to say "everyone'd be forced to evaluate what they're doing with their lives, and perhaps whether they're wasting same." Uncomfortable indeed.</p>
<p>Would their discomfort, well deserved and well earned <em>for being dickless fuckwits, all of them</em> bother you, too ? Would it be uncomfortable for you that they're uncomfortable ? After all, you love them, they're your family, which reduces to saying "<a href=http://www.seinology.com/scripts/script-116.shtml >we had a pact, you know</a>!"</p>
<p>So now, there it is : that's why. I write - and publish! - whatever crosses my mind because I solidly, and amply, despise the general public. Because I have as a matter of course constructed my own imperium, and my own auctoritas. Both, not just one. From the crenelated towers of that miniature fortress I can observe the strange mores of foreign people <em>as strange mores of foreign people</em>. Gauss doesn't publish - and what's more! doesn't write!!! - whatever crosses his mind because <b>he</b> doesn't feel that way. Let alone whether he is or could be, that's besides the point. He probably would have had a better shot than I ever will, but that's besides the point : any dog could walk his master, and any child could make his father go in the leash, on hands and knees, to fetch the ball. Few if any do. Why ?</p>
<p>And hence all the bullcrap about anonymity. O herpderp, they're <a href=http://chrishateswriting.com/post/76431353368/the-anonymity-i-know >anonymous online and therefore free men</a>. No women, women can't exist anonymously. And since we're on that topic : men either. What's left ? Oh, they can be free fifteen year olds online, and that was the best time of their life anyway, so... yeah ? Sweet. Technical solutions to political **** problems, don't you know. It's gonna work one of these days &lt;/sarcasm>.</p>
<p>---<br />
* I can write a novel about why I chose that particular word, and I will. I could have said "penis", like I'm some sort of хуйless university professor. But I did not want to do that, because that's not what I am. Or I could have said "cock", like the sort of hillbilly consumerist law-abiding Лох that really believes the word for rooster is an adequate <em>replacement</em> for his penis. You know, the word a replacement for the actual thing. Or I could have said dick, which is obscure enough to allow me an exit out of the net of "we would like you to use our words so that then you may be limited to considering problems we are ready to consider, and pick among the solutions we feel comfortable with". Schlong is merely one step further down that way, it's "the word those weird people use for the thing". </p>
<p>** No, not fucking his mother, not killing his father. Nobody in his right mind would be interested in the old prune, and besides - we know she's a slut anyway, don't we. And as to killing one's father - that is a sign of failure. You want your father, collared and naked, suckling your toes. Doing your bidding. Enslaving your father is the point, and killing him merely shows you've failed. Which is why people rarely kill their fathers, and frequently put them in homes. Which is why the movies my dickless, dog-keeping compatriots watch often include this touching scene with the grown man and his father - gotta establish the cool of the protagonist somehow, right ?</p>
<p>*** The problem is drastically complicated by the fact that Sparta was defeated, not just by the Empire of Mindless Zombies (aka Parthia) but even by the United States of Athens. And for that matter, the Sioux and Iroquois and other Indians (the other sort) bit it from the complex-if-castrated group something fierce. Turns out it's expensive to be a man, and even more expensive to be free. Who knew ? </p>
<p>**** Obviously that means psychiatric. There's no political problem at all outside of a translation of the shared insanity of groups of unhealthy minds.</p>
<p>*5 Wouldn't you say it's funny that English can't even <em>say</em> pula, at all, but it has ~500 different terms for ejaculate, like the fucking Eskimos' snow : whether it's fresh or caked, dried or scented, they do motherfucking describe that juice. The thing it came out of, however... god help us. The situation is exactly reversed in Romanian, or at least it was, until this last generation of 15yo fuckwits living the life in the global soup of nothing online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanislav Datskovskiy</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2014/hi-this-is-the-article-title/#comment-98342</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanislav Datskovskiy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=53073#comment-98342</guid>
		<description>If you hadn't already guessed - I am personally quite guilty of the kind of wanton 'forest destruction' described in the quoted log.  Despite having a computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hadn't already guessed - I am personally quite guilty of the kind of wanton 'forest destruction' described in the quoted log.  Despite having a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
