Comments on: The MPEx Rota

By: The first Roll of Judges - December 2012 on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.

The first Roll of Judges - December 2012 on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. — Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:20:54 +0000

[...] per the original article, a number of 7 interested bitizens applied for the position of Judge. One application was [...]

By: Bitcoin’s future should be more of the same. | Bitcoin Reporter

Bitcoin’s future should be more of the same. | Bitcoin Reporter — Sat, 18 May 2013 15:25:30 +0000

[...] recredited to the proper account). In this case, the argument escalated quickly and resulted in an ad-hoc court (which was created by the exchange operator) being called upon to decide who should rightfully possess the said bitcoins. As long as there are [...]

By: Mircea Popescu

Mircea Popescu — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:42:04 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Having received notice of these proceedings I will be answering to the court. I request the exclusion of no judges from considering the matter.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=e4Id
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

By: Wences

Wences — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:17:15 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I, the undersigned, having received the attached DEPOSIT slip from MPEx
(GPG fingerprint 8DDE 8C2B 4DE2 278A 95C3 D65B 9214 FC6B F1B6 9921), for
the sum of 130.04256216 mistakenly sent 130.00 BTC instead.

Attached further is a statement signed with the originatig BTC addresses
19StxPcpGtY4vcqLNoU76hBfKUwhUR7Xst to this effect.

This action is for recovery of the sum of 130.00 BTC under the Breach of
Fiduciary Duty cause.

https://blockchain.info/tx/fda6faabc7e95fd57de160642ecd351a469e954cdf61b8f17f35d20312c5fd34

https://blockchain.info/tx/7f60d180b378bcba98ede48c69073312067a6855002478e52f1ba5f0ea68024b
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ94kRAAoJEIjzwITvBkGnOnsH/jZA7PDscYqfq3i9t+UI3CHE
/Atn8wUsUx5buCEzE4AlTcw3lZdE4hadGIVFWrQP0Cd4bOHyq/OsBwnsOF8N2o6U
LsYvTvZtvXxRx9JFwC5bD1OZ5tBOFy2TsoXG8BOc4pXOR6ACS+UDzCdrwD+F4NkH
z3nTatdBFj0Cy3Neq5QncPawJrd6iRKWxYg/m6KbbYK9BCjERznNs/ybMe0rRfU1
ksdOKKDD6PjDRhfJcLBnsSJWl4gAshoKWRQTktAdKHuD63AfHAFKeDWsB76gbdvz
eMNe6X63SAP1rw+RungyUVbp+AaPWYHzlRO3Mf0IRUJyOzkNA8mlE2J2Lkt1NR8=
=6k94
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

By: Mircea Popescu

Mircea Popescu — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:59:11 +0000

Wences : the problem with this is that you fail to identify a cause of action. Is it "b) breach of fiduciary duty, for those cases where while no GPG-signed contract existed between the parties an equitable obligation does nevertheless allegedly arise for the defendant" ?