<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profesorul si minora</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mircea Popescu</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/#comment-161050</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea Popescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 01:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=30580#comment-161050</guid>
		<description>In related lulz, the curtains call for the US legal system came no later than in 538 U.S. 63 (2003), where the SCROTUS ruled that it needs "clearly established federal law" to tell it what "cruel and unusual" means. Since that's self-obviously language &lt;em&gt;intended&lt;/em&gt; as absolute rather than legally interpretable, the failure of the alleged supreme court to provide absolute interpretation directly resolves to a petition for the dissolution of the whole &lt;a href="http://trilema.com/2013/so-whos-running-the-courts-circus/"&gt;charade&lt;/a&gt;.

PS. The idiots are too &lt;a href="http://trilema.com/2012/gpg-contracts/"&gt;fucked up&lt;/a&gt; to manage even as basic a wonder as a workable URL system. Multiple cases authoritatively cite as "538 U.S. 63 (2003)", including Lockyer v. Andrade (the instant case), Smith &#038;  Bothelo vs Doe etc. Herp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In related lulz, the curtains call for the US legal system came no later than in 538 U.S. 63 (2003), where the SCROTUS ruled that it needs "clearly established federal law" to tell it what "cruel and unusual" means. Since that's self-obviously language <em>intended</em> as absolute rather than legally interpretable, the failure of the alleged supreme court to provide absolute interpretation directly resolves to a petition for the dissolution of the whole <a href="http://trilema.com/2013/so-whos-running-the-courts-circus/">charade</a>.</p>
<p>PS. The idiots are too <a href="http://trilema.com/2012/gpg-contracts/">fucked up</a> to manage even as basic a wonder as a workable URL system. Multiple cases authoritatively cite as "538 U.S. 63 (2003)", including Lockyer v. Andrade (the instant case), Smith &#038;  Bothelo vs Doe etc. Herp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pimp. By Robert Beck aka Iceberg Slim. Adnotated without permission. Chapter 3 -- Salty trip with Pepper. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/#comment-154999</link>
		<dc:creator>Pimp. By Robert Beck aka Iceberg Slim. Adnotated without permission. Chapter 3 -- Salty trip with Pepper. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 08:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=30580#comment-154999</guid>
		<description>[...] this dumb broad heard, "oh, kid's in reformatory after trying to market a fifteen year old hussy to her dad's friends &#38; coworkers" ? Or what exactly is this eighteen year old notable for, "he eats bush [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this dumb broad heard, "oh, kid's in reformatory after trying to market a fifteen year old hussy to her dad's friends &#38; coworkers" ? Or what exactly is this eighteen year old notable for, "he eats bush [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The last blog on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/#comment-153003</link>
		<dc:creator>The last blog on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=30580#comment-153003</guid>
		<description>[...] the pantsuit cosubstantially and dedicatedly resists this kind of transparency like snails resist salt : for dear life. But as pantsuit lives don't [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the pantsuit cosubstantially and dedicatedly resists this kind of transparency like snails resist salt : for dear life. But as pantsuit lives don't [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tell me, how does it feel ? on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/#comment-147773</link>
		<dc:creator>Tell me, how does it feel ? on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 14:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=30580#comment-147773</guid>
		<description>[...] socialism's ever bug-man. [&#8617;]Like Ce n-as dori sa mai vad pe post de bloguri and I guess Profesorul si minora or Functia asiguratorie a blogului or Requiescat si circulati or Dreptul de-a ne rezerva [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] socialism's ever bug-man. [&#8617;]Like Ce n-as dori sa mai vad pe post de bloguri and I guess Profesorul si minora or Functia asiguratorie a blogului or Requiescat si circulati or Dreptul de-a ne rezerva [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let's de-Ballas a Ballas piece. On rape. Well... on "rape", anyway. But it's with sexing genders and interns so you know... on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2011/profesorul-si-minora/#comment-143855</link>
		<dc:creator>Let's de-Ballas a Ballas piece. On rape. Well... on "rape", anyway. But it's with sexing genders and interns so you know... on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=30580#comment-143855</guid>
		<description>[...] no category for "how the girl feels retrospectively about it" just as there's no category for "what the dude thinking he owns the girl thinks about it". The act is not open to retrospective interpretation of any kind and by anyone ; if she has the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no category for "how the girl feels retrospectively about it" just as there's no category for "what the dude thinking he owns the girl thinks about it". The act is not open to retrospective interpretation of any kind and by anyone ; if she has the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
