The precise ways in which would-be spam specifically fails, self-crittingly fails to connect with Trilema stand out to me as a most resounding, obvious and ultimately immensely flattering testament to its respendent greatness.

"The facts", you see. Do you see ? What do you see when you do see ? Do you perhaps see a way in which to distinguish "the facts" of "Dane Mcculloh", machine-generated strings borne into this world bereft of any meaningful content and "the facts" of "just the facts" fame, in general consensive discourse among similar machine-generated strings borne into this world bereft of souls ? Do you see such a wonder ? Because I sure as fuck do not ; the talking heads on backlit screens are doing exactly this same thing here called spam : throwing meaningless gibberish at a presumed audience, the presumption itself based entirely on the pretense that something sticks.

How come my article isn't capable of being hooked by the pompous pre-constructed prose discussing "the facts" and "jumps" and "conclusions" ? They did all the required homework, why doesn't the exam taking take ? How come mine stands so far outside what passes for adequate performance in the herd ? Whence and whereby ?

From the top of the hill where I live, distinguishing "the people" far below from "the ants" closer below takes a lot of good will. It is an unmitigated exercise in faith & WSOD. But... well... what can you do. Besides, of course, "grand designs" of shockingly narrow minded things, and bee-minuses for effort.