<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moment de visare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/</link>
	<description>Moving targets for a fast crowd.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://polimedia.us</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More midden, more midden, have a look an' here we go... on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/#comment-159584</link>
		<dc:creator>More midden, more midden, have a look an' here we go... on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2021 23:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=7055#comment-159584</guid>
		<description>[...] There's no answer to be had. Why the unsuccessful were unsuccessful can readily be answered, by me or most anyone else. Their glaring inadequacies, shortcomings and altogether fecal composition are quite fucking painfully obvious, even if one's trying to look down from as far as the god damned Moon. All these answers'd be wrong, though : the "successful" are exactly the same! If presented with a Tupperware container full of rotten caserole aside a Tupperware container full of "perfectly fine" caserole, you can't say the rotten's rotten "because Tupperware sucks" : both had the same. Sure, in general "Tupperware sucks" might be an explanation as to why food in general went over ; but in the case at hand it's no kind of answer. "It's store-bought" fares no better in this light, nor does "it was kept in the fridge" etcetera. If the problem's to be earnestly approached as posed, one's forced to admit the loser's objection : yes he's a loser because he's a loser and a loser is a loser ; nevertheless this requires calling the other a loser too, and just as much, for the same exact reasons. Maybe then they could all be... equally successful ? Why keep the terminology in the negative ? Something relatively far away's correspondingly close from a "better" chosen vantage, and therefore... see ? Make America Socialist Again! Like it actually was, back in 1950! "War economy" and all that, they liked it fine. Time for a REBOOT!!!! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There's no answer to be had. Why the unsuccessful were unsuccessful can readily be answered, by me or most anyone else. Their glaring inadequacies, shortcomings and altogether fecal composition are quite fucking painfully obvious, even if one's trying to look down from as far as the god damned Moon. All these answers'd be wrong, though : the "successful" are exactly the same! If presented with a Tupperware container full of rotten caserole aside a Tupperware container full of "perfectly fine" caserole, you can't say the rotten's rotten "because Tupperware sucks" : both had the same. Sure, in general "Tupperware sucks" might be an explanation as to why food in general went over ; but in the case at hand it's no kind of answer. "It's store-bought" fares no better in this light, nor does "it was kept in the fridge" etcetera. If the problem's to be earnestly approached as posed, one's forced to admit the loser's objection : yes he's a loser because he's a loser and a loser is a loser ; nevertheless this requires calling the other a loser too, and just as much, for the same exact reasons. Maybe then they could all be... equally successful ? Why keep the terminology in the negative ? Something relatively far away's correspondingly close from a "better" chosen vantage, and therefore... see ? Make America Socialist Again! Like it actually was, back in 1950! "War economy" and all that, they liked it fine. Time for a REBOOT!!!! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You already had what you think you want and can't get. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/#comment-141622</link>
		<dc:creator>You already had what you think you want and can't get. on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 08:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=7055#comment-141622</guid>
		<description>[...] Let's do a little from the back issues of Trilema, translated :  Dream Time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Let's do a little from the back issues of Trilema, translated :  Dream Time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So I'm going to be a total asshole for a moment here on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/#comment-141085</link>
		<dc:creator>So I'm going to be a total asshole for a moment here on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 15:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=7055#comment-141085</guid>
		<description>[...] reminds me of what the Greeks are claiming. Dignity, right ? Common sense, pride, what Romania's useless generation has been derping about, this discussion of "pride" mixed into economy has very unflattering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reminds me of what the Greeks are claiming. Dignity, right ? Common sense, pride, what Romania's useless generation has been derping about, this discussion of "pride" mixed into economy has very unflattering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little bit of Bitcoin history on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/#comment-140842</link>
		<dc:creator>A little bit of Bitcoin history on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=7055#comment-140842</guid>
		<description>[...] enough to tolerate it are not likely to be itemized - roughly for the same reasons typified by "noi sclavi care nu avem servici"iv. Generally speaking there are reasons people don't, of their own power, amount to anything in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enough to tolerate it are not likely to be itemized - roughly for the same reasons typified by "noi sclavi care nu avem servici"iv. Generally speaking there are reasons people don't, of their own power, amount to anything in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So what do you want ? on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</title>
		<link>http://trilema.com/2010/moment-de-visare/#comment-140269</link>
		<dc:creator>So what do you want ? on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trilema.com/?p=7055#comment-140269</guid>
		<description>[...] all, which is to say into a person. [&#8617;]There's a very amusing older Romanian article entitled Moment de visare. You see, a small grassroots group tried to start a political movement in Romania half a decade ago [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all, which is to say into a person. [&#8617;]There's a very amusing older Romanian article entitled Moment de visare. You see, a small grassroots group tried to start a political movement in Romania half a decade ago [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
